RE: Attribute defaults

[Robin Cover <robin@isogen.com>]

Oh, heck, go for generality, but be honest:

(reserved)

<rnga:cheatMode>
{all the crufty hazardous stuff too 'complex' for RELAX NG
 which needs to be modeled for some purposes, but which would
 potentially diminish bragging claims WRT RELAX NG's putative simplicity}
</>

;-)

-r

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Michael Fitzgerald wrote:

> I am happy to do this, if we think a spec is necessary. Perhaps just a
> well-annotated pattern will do. Such could hold annotations (e.g.,
> <rnga:documentaion> and <rnga:defaultValue> or some such), but it might also
> hold other ancillary markup that is outside the pale of RELAX NG proper,
> things that we haven't thought of yet. -Mike
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jjc@jclark.com [mailto:jjc@jclark.com]
> Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2001 4:22 AM
> To: mike@wyeast.net; RNG List; Murata Makoto
> Subject: Re: Attribute defaults
> 
> 
> We ought to decide as a committee whether we want to produce a
> specification of a set of common annotations.  (If we do, I nominate
> Mike to write it!)
> 
> ----Original Message-----
>    >From:     	Michael Fitzgerald <mike@wyeast.net>
>    >To:         	RNG List <relax-ng@lists.oasis-open.org>; Murata
> Makoto <mura034@attglobal.net>
>    >Cc:
>    >Subj:     	Re: Attribute defaults
>    >Reply To:     	mike@wyeast.net
>    >Sent:    	20 ???????? 2544 14:30
>    >
>    >Yes, this would be outside the RELAX NG spec. It would come from a
> separate namespace, as James suggested.
>    >
>    >-Mike
>    >
>    >---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
>    >From: Murata Makoto <mura034@attglobal.net>
>    >Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 09:42:17 +0900
>    >
>    >>Michael Fitzgerald wrote:
>    >>
>    >>>
>    >>> Just a handful of markup for version 1.0 should prove
> sufficient to satisfy
>    >>> some important needs.
>    >>
>    >>Such markups should be separated from the spec of RELAX NG, since
> we do not
>    >>define any semantics for them.  If some spec introduces a:default
> or
>    >>a:defaultValue, the spec should define some subset of RELAX NG
> such that
>    >>grammars are unambiguous.
>    >>
>    >>Cheers,
>    >>
>    >>Makoto
>    >>
> 
> >>------------------------------------------------------------------
>    >>To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single
> word
>    >>"unsubscribe" in the body to:
> relax-ng-request@lists.oasis-open.org
>    >>
>    >
>    >------------------------------------------------------------------
>    >To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
>    >"unsubscribe" in the body to:
> relax-ng-request@lists.oasis-open.org
>    >
>    >
>    >
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
> "unsubscribe" in the body to: relax-ng-request@lists.oasis-open.org
>