[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [rights-requirements] Requirements Rev 14 - Proposed
I think it would be a mistake to call out the issuer of the permissions in such a definition. They certainly may come from parties other than those you list. Bob -----Original Message----- From: John Erickson [mailto:john_erickson@hplb.hpl.hp.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 7:59 AM To: rights-requirements@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [rights-requirements] Requirements Rev 14 - Proposed I'm wondering if it would be appropriate to include language such as: "...By 'permissions' we mean a set of usage rules declared by the originator or provider of an object or service, that is used by a compliant interpreter (such as a virtual machine) to control a recipient's access to and usage of the object or service...." ----- Original Message ----- From: "Reddy, Hari" <Hari.Reddy@CONTENTGUARD.COM> To: <rights-requirements@lists.oasis-open.org> Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 10:17 PM Subject: [rights-requirements] Requirements Rev 14 - Proposed Requirements Rev 14 - Proposed Hello Everyone: For Wed's meeting, I have integrated the introduction from Parama and reformated the Requirements Document. I am submitting this as Rev 14 - Proposed since we need to discuss the introduction. Regards, Hari ---------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC