[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Possible deprecation of <RespondWith>
Folks,
The SSTC would like to know if there are any current or pending SAML implementations that rely on the <RespondWith> element that is part of the SAML Protocol Request message.
Due to several outstanding issues with defining and processing this element, the SSTC plans to vote soon on making the <RepondWith> element a deprecated element in the SAML 1.1 specifications with the intent of removing it entirely in SAML 2.0.
Before doing so, however, we wanted to find out if there are any implementations that absolutely depend on it.
Thanks! Rob Philpott
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]