saml-dev message

Subject: RE: [saml-dev] Digital Signature Usage in X.509 Subject Attribute Query Specifications

From: "Scott Cantor" <cantor.2@osu.edu>
To: "'Anil John'" <aniltj@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 14:28:44 -0400

Anil John wrote on 2009-04-08:
> Any insights to share regarding the MUST vs. MAY usage of signing of
> the parts of the response in the two specs?

No memory of them whatsoever. I see X.509 and stop paying attention.

-- Scott

References:
- Digital Signature Usage in X.509 Subject Attribute Query Specifications
  - From: Anil John <aniltj@gmail.com>
- Re: [saml-dev] Digital Signature Usage in X.509 Subject Attribute Query Specifications
  - From: Anil John <aniltj@gmail.com>