sca-assembly message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-assembly] [ISSUE 107] Editorial cleanup of normative statements -Proposal
- From: Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com>
- To: sca-assembly@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:13:33 +0000
Dave,
Comments inline
Yours, Mike.
Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014 Mobile: +44-7802-467431
Email: mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com
From:
| David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com>
|
To:
| sca-assembly@lists.oasis-open.org
|
Date:
| 17/02/2009 14:28
|
Subject:
| Re: [sca-assembly] [ISSUE 107] Editorial
cleanup of normative statements - Proposal |
The text for 50023 and 50024 mentions the same conformance
statements.
I don't understand what that's trying to tell me.
Is it saying that all of the rules in 50018-50021 can
be checked at deployment time or at runtime?
Or is there something more subtle being stated?
<mje>
It is saying that "reference multiplicity
errors" are defined in terms of a violation of one
or more of the statements 50018 - 50021,
which contain the normative definitions of how
multiplicity must be treated. I added
this to clarify what each of 50023 and 50024
meant, but perhaps I'm wide of the mark here.
Can you suggest a better way of saying this?
</mje>
typo in 12008 - MAY not to provide
<mje> Thanks for spotting that</mje>
Dave Booz
STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture
Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC
"Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093
e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com
Mike
Edwards ---02/16/2009 07:06:18 AM---Folks, Here is my proposal to fix the
problems with the normative statements
From:
|
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com>
|
To:
|
"OASIS Assembly" <sca-assembly@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
Date:
|
02/16/2009 07:06 AM
|
Subject:
|
[sca-assembly] [ISSUE 107] Editorial cleanup of normative statements -
Proposal |
Folks,
Here is my proposal to fix the problems with the normative statements identified
in ASSEMBLY-107:
50023
50024
60020
12004
12005
12008
12025
This is done as a Rev5 of the CD02 version of the spec, which also contains
a set of editorial changes
resulting from Vamsi's thorough review of the spec (BUT NOT any normative
changes from that...)/
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-assembly/download.php/31230/sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd02-Rev5.pdf
Yours, Mike.
Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014 Mobile: +44-7802-467431
Email: mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]