[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [sca-assembly] REOPEN ISSUES 132 and 149: Update to Sanjay'sProposal
Mike, As mentioned on today’s call, we’ll need to ask the
assistance of Mary and perhaps other members of the OASIS staff about this
topic, but I do not see how these templates would need to be elevated to formal
OASIS Specification status because unlike the SCA Assembly Model specification,
which truly is an OASIS spec as it contains “specification”
language, these proposed documents contain requirements language (in the form
of templates) that are intended to assist the user community with verifying an
SCA Runtime’s conformance with a SCA Assembly Model specification. Looking over the various OASIS document templates (http://docs.oasis-open.org/templates/),
I do not see on in place for such a technical work product. Raising these documents to full Specification level will most certainly
impede our progress on ratifying the SCA Assembly Model v1.1 spec and I hope
that is not the case, but we certainly need to find out sooner rather than
later. Would you like me to reach out to Mary and the OASIS staff about
this or would you and/or Martin as TC co-chairs prefer to initiative the
question? Just let me know. Cheers… - Jeff E. From: Mike Edwards
[mailto:mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com]
Unless
stated otherwise above:
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]