Re: [sca-bindings] ISSUE-33: Correlation property names are odd,and the space of options is not extensible.

[Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>]

Logged as: http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-33

-Eric.

Eric Johnson wrote:
> (resending with correct prefix, for anyone with a filter - sorry.)
> Target: Web services binding specification, WD 02
>
> Description:
> Current allowed names for "correlation" are "RequestMsgIDtoCorrelID",
> and "RequestCorrelIDToCorrelID".  These names are long, and yet oddly
> shortened.  Further, a "None" option is defined, it it is not clear
> whether this is meant to foreclose vendor specific notions of
> correlation, or to flag that a vendor specific correlation is defined
> elsewhere.
>
> Proposal:
> For the two defined correlation approaches, drop the redundant parts of
> the label, the "ToCorrelID", and "Request" parts, and remove
> abbreviations on the remainder, to yield "MessageID", and 
> "CorrelationID".
>
> Change the definition of the schema element to allow any QName here, so
> as to provide a way for vendors to identify their own correlation
> customizations.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in 
> OASIS
> at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php