Re: [sca-bindings] ISSUE-34: Clarify default function selection anddata binding behavior

[Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>]

Logged as: http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-34

-Eric.

Eric Johnson wrote:
> Target: JMS Binding specification
>
> Description:
> There is no obvious way for a Java implementation to manufacture a 
> JMSMessage for a return value for the default data binding.
>
> Also, it is traditional to carry XML in a BytesMessage, rather than a 
> TextMessage.
>
> Should we allow the selection of the operation from a document-wrapped 
> XML message?
>
> Proposal:
> Drop the notion of returning a JMSMessage as the result of an operation.
>
> Allow the use of BytesMessage and TextMessage to carry XML payload.
>
> For any interface with multiple operations, either the 
> scaOperationName must exist, or the operation name is taken from the 
> name of the root element of the XML payload.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in 
> OASIS
> at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php