[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Raw minutes for 10 July
[12:01] Simon Holdsworth: Audio conference: Meeting Number: * 913929 * (press * before and after the digits) Phone numbers: Austria = Vienna 026822056419 Belgium = Brussels 022901709 China Toll Free = China North 108007121722, China South 108001201722 Denmark = Copenhagen 32714982 France = Paris 0170994364, Lyon 0426840196, Marseilles 0488915310 Germany = Berlin 030726167296, Frankfurt 069710445413, Hamburg 040809020620, Munich 089244432767, Stuttgart 0711490813212, Dusseldorf 021154073845 India Toll Free = 0008001006703 Ireland = Dublin 014367612 Italy = Milan 0230413007, Rome 06452108288, Turin 01121792100 Japan = Tokyo 0357675037 Netherlands = Amsterdam 0207965349 Portugal = Lisbon 211200415 Russia Toll Free = 81080022074011 Spain = Barcelona: 934923140, Madrid: 917889793 Sweden = Stockholm 0850520404 Switzerland = Geneva 0225927186 UK Toll Free = 08003581667 UK Toll = London 02071542988, Manchester 01612500379, Birmingham 01212604587 USA Toll Free = 18665289390 USA Toll = 19543344789
[12:01] Simon Holdsworth: Agenda:
[12:01] Simon Holdsworth: 1. Opening Introductions Roll call Scribe assignment Top 10 on the scribe list (full list below): Tom Rutt Fujitsu Limited David Booz IBM Bryan Aupperle IBM Laurent Domenech TIBCO Software Inc. Simon Nash IBM Michael Beisiegel IBM Martin Chapman Oracle Corporation Sanjay Patil SAP AG Ashok Malhotra Oracle Corporation Eric Johnson TIBCO Software Inc. Agenda bashing 2. Approval of minutes of SCA-Binding TC meeting of 26th June http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/28690/SCA%20Bindings%20minutes%202008-06-26.doc 3. Actions 20080304-3 [Simon Nash] Submit an updated proposal for resolution of issue 2. Need to wait for Java issue 25 to be resolved. 20080304-9 [Editors] Update specs for outcome of ASSEMBLY-55. 20080304-10 [Editors] Add sentence to specs: "Any SCA runtime that claims to support this binding must abide by the requirements of this specification" (done for JMS binding spec and WS binding spec) 20080424-1 [Editors] Action: editors to incorporate editorial issue from Erics email into the specs: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200804/msg00008.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200807/msg00000.html 20080501-3 [Editors] Apply changes required by Latest/This Version URI for Schema/WSDL file to bindings specifications as defined by: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200804/msg00050.html 20080626-1 [Eric Johnson] Clarify review comment from JMS binding p.8 line 110 and p.10 line 169 20080626-2 [Anish Karmarkar] Produce some words describing the recommended relationship between SCA services/bindings and WSDL services/ports. (note: not recorded in chat room transcript). 5. Face to Face agenda Thursday 17th: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/group_public/event.php?event_id=18353&day=1216267200 Friday 18th: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/group_public/event.php?event_id=18354&day=1216353600 6. New Issues none 7. Open Issue Discussion Open issues with proposed resolutions: http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-11 "Formal" WSDL generation is unclear, ambiguous, and incomplete Raiser: Eric Johnson, owner: Eric Johnson, Anish Karmarkar Status: Updated proposed resolution: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200807/msg00004.html Open issues with identified resolution owner: http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-2 How should SCA callback semantics be carried over Web Services? Raiser: Simon Nash, owner: Simon Nash Status: Waiting for clarification around conversations at the assembly level (action item 20080304-3) http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-20 JMS binding URI should follow JMS IRI scheme submitted to IETF Raiser: Simon Holdsworth, owner: Simon Holdworth Status: Specific resolution text required Notes: The new draft is now at: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-merrick-jms-uri-03.txt (and the metadata about the submission - https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/draft-merrick-jms-uri/) http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-21 Support for callback and conversation ID-s in bindings Raiser: Peter Peshev, owner Peter Peshev Status: Proposed resolution in issue Notes: As for BINDINGS-2, this is waiting for clarification around conversations at the assembly level http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-31 What is a "plain name" for a connection factories or activation specs, and how is one distinguished from a JNDI name? Raiser: Eric Johnson, owner: Simon Holdsworth Status: Specific resolution text required http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-33 Correlation property names are odd, and the space of options is not extensible Raiser: Eric Johnson, owner: Simon Holdsworth Status: Specific resolution text required http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-35 Allow topics anywhere that queues can be used Raiser: Eric Johnson, owner: Simon Holdsworth Status: Specific resolution text required Open issues with no identified resolution owner: http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-7 JMS bindingType and ordered intent - clarification needed Raiser: Peter Peshev Status: resolution required http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-22 Bindings specifications should provide exemplary Implementations for Callbacks and Conversations Raiser: Mike Edwards Status: No proposed resolution Notes: As for BINDINGS-2, this is waiting for clarification around conversations at the assembly level http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-23 @wsdlElement definition needs clarification on "equivalent" and use of WSDL 2.0 constructs Raiser: Eric Johnson Status: Specific resolution text required http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-24 Which wire did a message arrive on? Raiser: Sanjay Patil Status: No proposed resolution http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-25 Is it required that every implementation of binding.ws support the soap intent? Raiser: Anish Karmarkar Status: No current proposal. Latest email: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200807/msg00006.html http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-27 Identifying data binding and operation selection Raiser: Mike Rowley Status: Specific resolution text and scope required http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-28 Specifying JNDI context URI Raiser: Piotr Przybylski Status: No current proposal http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-29 Properties on Bindings Raiser: Piotr Przybylski Status: No current proposal 8. AOB
[12:06] Bryan Aupperle: Scribe: Bryan Aupperle
[12:07] Bryan Aupperle: Agenda Review - No changes
[12:08] Bryan Aupperle: Approval of minutes of last meeting - no comments. Approved w/o
[12:08] Bryan Aupperle: Action Items:
[12:09] Bryan Aupperle: 20080304-3: still under debate in Java TC
[12:10] Bryan Aupperle: 20080424-1 e-mail posted awaiting final agreement
[12:11] Eric Johnson: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200806/msg00042.html
[12:11] Bryan Aupperle: 20080626-1 done
[12:11] Bryan Aupperle: Eric's link is for this AI.
[12:12] Bryan Aupperle: s/done/await final agreement/
[12:13] Bryan Aupperle: 20080626-2 e-mail sent
[12:14] Eric Johnson: Anish's action item - his email: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200807/msg00005.html
[12:14] Bryan Aupperle: Relates to issue 11 - e-mail provides some background. AI is complete.
[12:14] Bryan Aupperle: F2F agenda:
[12:15] Bryan Aupperle: Draft is in calendar entries
[12:17] anish i'll have to leave early. Around 4pm on friday
[12:19] Bryan Aupperle: Some discussion about end time on Friday due to flights.
[12:20] Bryan Aupperle: Friday start will be moved up 30 min.
[12:22] Bryan Aupperle: What about JCA issues? All open issues are on the agenda.
[12:24] Bryan Aupperle: Overall schedule needs to be discussed - will cover as part of CD discussion.
[12:25] Bryan Aupperle: Chair to put a rough schedule in place for which issues to cover on which calls.
[12:26] Bryan Aupperle: JCA will be explicitly included.
[12:26] Bryan Aupperle: Issue 11:
[12:26] Bryan Aupperle: Updatd proposal: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200807/msg00004.html
[12:32] Bryan Aupperle: Discussion of the first SHOULD in section 4.2 of the proposal.
[12:41] Bryan Aupperle: Consensus is to change SHOULD to MUST and first clause should be targeted explicitly to bare <binding.ws>.
[12:46] Bryan Aupperle: Discussion of SOAP1.1 vs SOAP 1.2
[12:57] Bryan Aupperle: An intent on a service or reference logically adorns an otherwise bare <binding.ws>
[12:58] Bryan Aupperle: Overall scope of 4.2 needs to be clarified with respect to intents.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]