[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: question on priority of solving issue bindings 02
During the call on 4/2 we gave the following priority for resolving bindings 2 *Ashok:* BINDINGS-2 -- Top on nice-to-have pile I am a little confused. I thought that Anish proposal was for an optional but normative protocol for use with the wsdl binding. If we do not have at least one normative way to do callbacks, how can we say the wsdl binding of sca supports bidir interfaces? Are we saying that support of bi-dir interfaces in wsdl binding is merely nice to have but not crucial for progressing the spec? Tom -- ---------------------------------------------------- Tom Rutt email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732 774 5133
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]