sca-bindings message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-bindings] bindings xsd files, RDDL file update, diff files
- From: Simon Holdsworth <simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com>
- To: "OASIS Bindings" <sca-bindings@lists.oasis-open.org>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:19:04 +0100
Mike,
OK, the bindings TC voted to accept
and publish the cd02 versions of the bindings specs listed below, although
they never made it to the docs.oasis-open.org site, so the title page for
each should point to these as the previous version, rather than CD01:
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/31233/sca-binding-jms-1.1-spec-cd02.doc
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/31234/sca-binding-jms-1.1-spec-cd02.pdf
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/31231/sca-binding-jca-1.1-spec-cd02.doc
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/31232/sca-binding-jca-1.1-spec-cd02.pdf
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/31235/sca-binding-ws-1.1-spec-cd02.doc
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/31236/sca-binding-ws-1.1-spec-cd02.pdf
Unless anyone objects I will update
JMS and JCA as above, Anish I'll assume your doing binding.ws unless you
would like to me to do all three together.
Regards, Simon
Simon Holdsworth
STSM, SCA Bindings Architect; Master Inventor; OASIS SCA Bindings TC Chair
MP 211, IBM UK Labs, Hursley Park, Winchester SO21 2JN, UK
Tel +44-1962-815059 (Internal 245059) Fax +44-1962-816898
Internet - Simon_Holdsworth@uk.ibm.com
Mike Edwards/UK/IBM@IBMGB wrote on 29/06/2009 13:24:22:
>
> Simon,
>
> I don't know how much thought that Assembly gave to this.
>
> Although not formally published in the way that CD03 was published,
> CD02 was a formally voted Committee Draft and is available at
> a public URI, which is the one quoted on the front page of CD03. It
> seems natural for CD03 to point back to the formally voted previous
> version, which is CD02, whereever it is located.
>
>
> Yours, Mike.
>
> Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
> Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
> IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
> Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014 Mobile: +44-7802-467431
> Email: mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com
>
>
> From:
>
> Simon Holdsworth/UK/IBM@IBMGB
>
> To:
>
> "OASIS Bindings" <sca-bindings@lists.oasis-open.org>
>
> Date:
>
> 29/06/2009 11:15
>
> Subject:
>
> Re: [sca-bindings] bindings xsd files, RDDL file update, diff files
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Mike,
>
> Do you know the answer to the previous version question for
> Assembly? Was it a requirement that cd03 links to cd02 whereever
it
> is, even if not formally published? Or would it be OK for cd03
to
> refer to cd01 as the previous version? Just seems strange that
the
> Assembly CD03 should point to the document repository for the
> previous version.
>
> Regards, Simon
>
> Simon Holdsworth
> STSM, SCA Bindings Architect; Master Inventor; OASIS SCA Bindings
TC Chair
> MP 211, IBM UK Labs, Hursley Park, Winchester SO21 2JN, UK
> Tel +44-1962-815059 (Internal 245059) Fax +44-1962-816898
> Internet - Simon_Holdsworth@uk.ibm.com
>
> Mike Edwards/UK/IBM@IBMGB wrote on 29/06/2009 10:30:56:
>
> >
> > Simon,
> >
> > You need to get Assembly TC to update the RDDL file.
> >
> > The Assembly TC is very accommodating to these requests ;-)
> >
> > Yours, Mike.
> >
> > Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
> > Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
> > IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great
Britain.
> > Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014 Mobile: +44-7802-467431
> > Email: mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com
> >
>
> >
> > From:
> >
> > Simon Holdsworth/UK/IBM@IBMGB
> >
> > To:
> >
> > "OASIS Bindings" <sca-bindings@lists.oasis-open.org>
> >
> > Date:
> >
> > 29/06/2009 10:22
> >
> > Subject:
> >
> > [sca-bindings] bindings xsd files, RDDL file update, diff files
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Folks,
> >
> > Some questions about the cd03 packages:
> >
> > XSD availability
> >
> > In the Assembly CD03 package, the bindings xsd files are named:
> >
> > sca-binding-jca-1.1-cd02.xsd
> > sca-binding-jms-1.1-cd02.xsd
> > sca-binding-ws-1.1-cd02.xsd
> >
> > Within the binding cd03 spec documents,we refer to these schema
> > without the -1.1-cd02 suffix (or indeed, -1.1-cd03). I assume
that's
> > OK and that's what Assembly does, although I think the title
of the
> > XML schema appendix would be more accurately named to include
the
> > -1.1 suffix, ie. "sca-binding-XXX-1.1.xsd"
> >
> > Within the Assembly CD03 package, the RDDL file references these
> > three bindings xsd files, however when I look at http://docs.oasis-
> > open.org/ns/opencsa/sca/200903, the HTML file does not include
links
> > to any bindings XSD files except for binding.sca; those
that it
> > does reference are qualifed with -1.1-cd03. Note that the
following
> > URL does work: http://docs.oasis-open.org/opencsa/sca-assembly/sca-
> > binding-ws-1.1-cd02.xsd, although its not linked from the RDDL
file.
> >
> > So, as part of the publication of the bindings specs, I believe
we
> > need to ensure that:
> >
> > 1) The binding spec packages include .xsd files extracted from
the
> > documents and renamed to -1.1-cd03.xsd (these already refer to
the
> > cd03 assembly namespace and core xsd file)
> > 2) These xsd files are made available at http://docs.oasis-open.
> > org/opencsa/sca-assembly/
> > 3) The RDDL file at http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/opencsa/sca/200903
> > is updated to include these three .xsd files
> >
> > Is this something that we can do purely from the bindings group,
or
> > do we need the Assembly TC to agree/action this?
> >
> > cd02 diff files:
> >
> > The assembly cd03 package includes a cd02-cd03-diff file for
.doc, .
> > html and .pdf, however those files are not available on docs.oasis-
> > open.org. I assume these are in the package for the TC's
> > convenience, I'll include that in the bindings packages.
> >
> > Previous version links:
> >
> > I notice that assembly cd03 refers to the previous version by
> > pointing at the Assembly TC document store, not to docs.oasis-open.
> > org. I assume that's because cd02 was never formally published.
> > Currently the bindings specs have previous version set to cd01,
> > which was published. Should we be pointing at the unpublished
cd02
> > from the binding specs via the document store, or just leave
as is
> > pointing at cd01?
> >
> > Regards, Simon
> >
> > Simon Holdsworth
> > STSM, SCA Bindings Architect; Master Inventor; OASIS SCA Bindings
TC Chair
> > MP 211, IBM UK Labs, Hursley Park, Winchester SO21 2JN, UK
> > Tel +44-1962-815059 (Internal 245059) Fax +44-1962-816898
> > Internet - Simon_Holdsworth@uk.ibm.com
> >
> >
>
> > Unless stated otherwise above:
> > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales
with
> > number 741598.
> > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire
PO6 3AU
> >
> >
> >
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> > Unless stated otherwise above:
> > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales
with
> > number 741598.
> > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire
PO6 3AU
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with
> number 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire
PO6 3AU
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with
> number 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire
PO6 3AU
>
>
>
>
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]