[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-bindings] Problem with application of BINDINGS-76
My apologies for not applying it correctly. I'll now go stand in the corner. -Anish -- David Booz wrote: > BINDINGS-76 appears to have been properly re-applied and just for kicks > I check 79 and 82 (also in rev6) and am satisified that they were > correctly applied. 76 was definitely applied incorrectly to rev6. > > Dave Booz > STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture > Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC > "Distributed objects first, then world hunger" > Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093 > e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com > > Inactive hide details for Simon Holdsworth ---07/01/2009 05:26:57 > AM---OK, in order to be very clear, but at the risk of confusSimon > Holdsworth ---07/01/2009 05:26:57 AM---OK, in order to be very clear, > but at the risk of confusing everyone, I've uploaded sca-wsbinding-1 > > > From: > Simon Holdsworth <simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com> > > To: > sca-bindings@lists.oasis-open.org > > Date: > 07/01/2009 05:26 AM > > Subject: > Re: [sca-bindings] Problem with application of BINDINGS-76 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > OK, in order to be very clear, but at the risk of confusing everyone, > I've uploaded sca-wsbinding-1.1-spec-cd02-rev7.doc/.pdf, which is based > off the version of the document approved on Thursday 25th of June, with > all chanegs accepted, then the change history corrected and the > sca-binding-ws-1.1-cd03.xsd fixed for the correct application of issue 76. > > I also fixed the callback xsd which was missing a close comment on the > copyright line. I noticed when I did this that the anyAttribute in this > schema uses ##any rather than ##other - if that's a problem we'll need > to open a separate issue to fix it after PRD. > > I would urge folks to take a look at this revision which I intend to > discuss/vote on as the revised cd03/PRD on the call of 9th July. > > Regards, Simon > > Simon Holdsworth > STSM, SCA Bindings Architect; Master Inventor; OASIS SCA Bindings TC Chair > MP 211, IBM UK Labs, Hursley Park, Winchester SO21 2JN, UK > Tel +44-1962-815059 (Internal 245059) Fax +44-1962-816898 > Internet - Simon_Holdsworth@uk.ibm.com > > Simon Holdsworth/UK/IBM@IBMGB wrote on 01/07/2009 09:46:51: > > > > > OK, although I'm not keen to delay the PRD, I will put this on the > > agenda for the next call 9th July, and aim to have the package ready > > asap after that. In the meantime I'll proceed with the PRD packages > > for the JMS and JCA bindings. > > > > Regards, Simon > > > > Simon Holdsworth > > STSM, SCA Bindings Architect; Master Inventor; OASIS SCA Bindings TC > Chair > > MP 211, IBM UK Labs, Hursley Park, Winchester SO21 2JN, UK > > Tel +44-1962-815059 (Internal 245059) Fax +44-1962-816898 > > Internet - Simon_Holdsworth@uk.ibm.com > > > > > > > Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com> > > 30/06/2009 20:55 > > > > To > > > > Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com> > > > > cc > > > > David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com>, sca-bindings@lists.oasis-open.org > > > > Subject > > > > Re: [sca-bindings] Problem with application of BINDINGS-76 > > > > > > > > > > I am dubious as well about making this change to an already-voted > > CD and PRD, even if the change is editorial. As the change affects > > substantive text and not just formatting or front matter, I would > > think we need another TC vote to accept the updated document as > > CD03 and the PRD. > > > > Simon > > > > Eric Johnson wrote: > > > Not sure I agree with Dave's assessment. We have a step in our issue > > > process specifically for the case of issues incorrectly applied - > "edits > > > rejected". > > > > > > What other time would we be rejecting those edits except as part of a > > > vote for a CD? > > > > > > In any case, my interpretation of the vote was that we were accepting > > > the documents as-is. Which means that we now have two competing > > > decisions by the TC, which can probably only be resolved by another > vote > > > of the TC. > > > > > > -Eric. > > > > > > David Booz wrote: > > >> > > >> The accepted resolution of ISSUE-76 included those changes, therefore > > >> I assert it is an editorial task to bring the document back into line > > >> with the agreed resolution. > > >> > > >> Dave Booz > > >> STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture > > >> Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC > > >> "Distributed objects first, then world hunger" > > >> Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093 > > >> e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com > > >> > > >> Inactive hide details for Simon Holdsworth ---06/30/2009 10:22:30 > > >> AM---In extracting the .xsd for binding.ws from the cd03 docuSimon > > >> Holdsworth ---06/30/2009 10:22:30 AM---In extracting the .xsd for > > >> binding.ws from the cd03 document > (http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ > > >> > > >> > > >> From: > > >> Simon Holdsworth <simon_holdsworth@uk.ibm.com> > > >> > > >> To: > > >> "OASIS Bindings" <sca-bindings@lists.oasis-open.org> > > >> > > >> Date: > > >> 06/30/2009 10:22 AM > > >> > > >> Subject: > > >> [sca-bindings] Problem with application of BINDINGS-76 > > >> > > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> In extracting the .xsd for binding.ws from the cd03 document > > >> (http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/33170/sca- > > wsbinding-1.1-spec-cd03.doc) > > >> I did a quick comparison against the xsd from cd02, and realised that > > >> BINDINGS-76 resolution has not been fully applied, in that the schema > > >> has not been updated to remove wireFormat and operationSelector > > >> elements, modify the EPR type to EndpointReferenceType and remove the > > >> anyAttribute element. > > >> > > >> What's the best way to handle this? Given that the document without > > >> these changes has been approved by the TC, I'm not sure I can > treat it > > >> as editorial and just fix it in cd03; the only formal option I can > see > > >> is to raise a new issue. Is there any way to include an errata with > > >> the Public Review Draft, or should we wait for publication, apply > this > > >> change in cd03 and have another vote on the next call? > > >> > > >> Regards, Simon > > >> > > >> Simon Holdsworth > > >> STSM, SCA Bindings Architect; Master Inventor; OASIS SCA Bindings > TC Chair > > >> MP 211, IBM UK Labs, Hursley Park, Winchester SO21 2JN, UK > > >> Tel +44-1962-815059 (Internal 245059) Fax +44-1962-816898 > > >> Internet - Simon_Holdsworth@uk.ibm.com > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > >> / > > >> / > > >> > > >> /Unless stated otherwise above: > > >> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with > > >> number 741598. > > >> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire > PO6 > > >> 3AU/ > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Unless stated otherwise above: > > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with > > number 741598. > > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire > PO6 3AU > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > / > / > > /Unless stated otherwise above: > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number > 741598. > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU/ > > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]