[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: NEW ISSUE: BWS50013's target is a WSDL 1.1. document, is that appropriate?
Title: BWS50013's target is a WSDL 1.1. document, is that appropriate? Spec: sca-wsbinding-1.1-spec-cd04 Description: BWS50013 states -- The following is the list of WSDL/1.1 elements whose scope contains the Policy Subjects allowed for a WSCallback policy assertion but which MUST NOT have WSCallback policy assertions attached: wsdl:portType [BWS50013] We haven't defined WSDL 1.1 as a conformance target. Proposal: We could go one of two ways, we could define WSDL 1.1 as a target OR we could refactor this to state that such policy assertions cannot occur on wsdl:portType without using RFC2119 keywords, and add a requirement that says that for a SCA WS Binding XML document to be conformant any referred WSDL 1.1 portType from that document MUST NOT have the callback policy assertion attached. -Anish --
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]