Re: [sca-j-comment] comment on @WebParam/@WebResult

[Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com>]

Scott,

In relation to the whole of that section,
for items like "Sets parameter name" this is *always* talking
about the mapping to
WSDL - that is what these JAX-WS annotations
are all about.

You are right in saying that the Java
is what it is, but the WSDL mapped from that Java is what is at issue here
- and 
nominally, SCA is working off that WSDL
mapping.


Yours, Mike

Dr Mike Edwards		Mail Point 146, Hursley Park
STSM		Winchester, Hants SO21 2JN
SCA & Services Standards		United Kingdom
Co-Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC
IBM Software Group
Phone:	+44-1962 818014
Mobile:	+44-7802-467431 (274097)
e-mail:	mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com

From:	Scott Kurz <skurz@us.ibm.com>
To:	sca-j-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
Date:	24/11/2010 16:03
Subject:	[sca-j-comment] comment on @WebParam/@WebResult

---

This is a small point but...

 I was looking over section: 
 11.1 JAX-WS Annotations and SCA Interfaces
and thinking maybe there is no point in calling out 'name' and 'partName'
for @WebParam/@WebResult as specially affected from the SCA perspective.
  

The parameter name is already in the Java, so saying "Sets
parameter name" implies
that this is a parameter name to be used for some other SCA purpose.  
  E.g. the fact that 'operationName' is called out on @WebMethod implies
that, as the SCA operation name, this is the value that will be used for
something like interface compatibility comparison and operation selection
on the JMS binding.   

Maybe I just don't understand what this other purpose is... I'm pretty
sure it doesn't matter for interface compatibility comparison.    
 Or maybe it just slipped in but isn't needed.

----- 

On a separate but related note, it's interesting that JAX-WS 2.2 went and
added the option of using @XmlElement in place of @WebParam, (I might be
slightly misphrasing that), which is a tighter integration with JAXB rather
than a looser one which can be used with JAXB or SDO.   So,  in
not having to consider that, 2.1 was a cleaner level for us to base on,

Regards, 

Scott Kurz

---

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU