[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-j-jee] Working Draft 03
Dave, Could you elaborate on why you think EJB binding spec should be incorporated into this document? I tend to think that EJB binding spec stands on its own. This would allow an SCA runtime that does not want to have a full-fledged JEE support to have references with EJB binding pointing to external services. -Anish -- David Booz wrote: > Regrets for the call today, a conflict popped up unexpectedly. > > I have reviewed WD03 from Mike E and I think it is another good step > forward. There are a few comments in the doc worth discussing and I've > noted a few very small changes that I'll communicate later. I would urge > that we continue refining the document, and consider incorporating the > EJB binding spec into this document as a near term, next step. > > Speak to you all next week. > > > Dave Booz > STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture > Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC > "Distributed objects first, then world hunger" > Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093 > e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]