Re: [sca-j] Should introduction of @Local annotation (JAVA-3) affect theSemantics of an Unannotated Implementation

[Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com>]

Folks,

An @Local annotation would certainly
affect the semantics of an unannotated implementation.

An interface so marked would clearly
indicate something relating to an SCA reference.


Yours,  Mike.

Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014    Mobile: +44-7802-467431  
Email:  mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com

From:	C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com>
To:	Simon Nash/UK/IBM@IBMGB
Cc:	sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org
Date:	27/08/2008 09:09
Subject:	[sca-j] Should introduction of @Local annotation (JAVA-3) affect the Semantics of an Unannotated Implementation

---

Simon,

Should the introduction of @Local annotation affect the "Semantics
of an
Unannotated Implementation" (section 8 in sca-javaci-draft-20070926.doc)
where we are currently using only interfaces marked with @Remotable in
computing the references/properties of an implementation?

++Vamsi


                    
                     
                     
          
             Simon Nash      
                     
                     
 
             <NASH@uk.ibm.com>  
                     
                    
                    
                     
                     
       To 
             27/08/2008 12:57    
     sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org        
 
                    
                     
                     
       cc 
                    
                     
                     
          
                    
                     
                     
  Subject 
                    
                  Re: [sca-j]
Introspecting services  
                    
                  offered
by a Java implementation    
                    
                  class without
@Service              
                    
                     
                     
          
                    
                     
                     
          
                    
                     
                     
          
                    
                     
                     
          
                    
                     
                     
          
                    
                     
                     
          




Raymond,
Minor nit: the @OneWay annotation applies to a method, not to an
interface.  Your example should be updated to show this.

In your example, these services are local.  Issue JAVA-3 has proposed
a new
annotation @Local that could be used on Interface1and Interface2 to allow
them to be recognized by the introspection algorithm.

I believe this discussion can be handled under JAVA-3 and there is no need
to create a new issue.

    Simon

Simon C. Nash, IBM Distinguished Engineer
Member of the IBM Academy of Technology
Tel. +44-1962-815156  Fax +44-1962-818999


                    
                     
                     
          
 Raymond Feng                  
                     
                     
 <rfeng@us.ibm.com>              
                     
                   
                    
                     
                     
       To 
 25/08/2008 17:25                
           sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org  
 
                    
                     
                     
       cc 
                    
                     
                     
          
                    
                     
                     
  Subject 
                    
                     
  [sca-j] Introspecting         
                    
                     
  services offered by a Java    
                    
                     
  implementation class without  
                    
                     
  @Service                
     
                    
                     
                     
          
                    
                     
                     
          
                    
                     
                     
          
                    
                     
                     
          
                    
                     
                     
          
                    
                     
                     
          
                    
                     
                     
          





Hi,

In Java Component Implementation Specification 1.00, we have the following
statements:

143 1.2.1.3. Introspecting services offered by a Java implementation
144 In the cases described below, the services offered by a Java
implementation class may be determined
145 through introspection, eliding the need to specify them using @Service.
The following algorithm is used to
146 determine how services are introspected from an implementation class:
147 If the interfaces of the SCA services are not specified with the
@Service annotation on the implementation
148 class, it is assumed that all implemented interfaces that have been
annotated as @Remotable are the
149 service interfaces provided by the component. If none of the
implemented interfaces is remotable, then by
150 default the implementation offers a single service whose type is the
implementation class.

What if an interface is annotated with SCA annotations such as @OneWay
or
@Callback?

For example:

public class MyServiceImpl implements Interface1, Interface2 {
}

@Callback(CallbackInterface.class)
public interface Interface1 {
}

@OneWay
public interface Interface2 {
}

By the spec, there is only one service named MyServiceImpl. But isn't it
more natural that we should find two SCA services: Interface1 and
Interface2? Please clarify.

Thanks,
Raymond


Raymond Feng
Senior Software Engineer, Open Source SCA Development, Apache Tuscany
Project
IBM Bay Area Lab, 1001 E Hillsdale Blvd, Suite 400, Foster City, CA 94404,
USA
E-mail: rfeng@us.ibm.com, Notes: Raymond Feng/Burlingame/IBM, Tel:
650-645-8117, T/L: 367-8117
Web & Blog: www.enjoyjava.com
- The Cyber Cafeteria to Enjoy Java












Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU









---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

---

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU