OASIS Mailing List Archives
View the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using
MarkMail
.
This list only
All OASIS lists
Help:
OASIS Mailing Lists Help
|
MarkMail Help
sca-j
110 messages in this archive
(listed by date, most recent first)
|
Thread Index
|
List Home
NEW ISSUE: Sharing Java artifacts across contributions
From
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com> on 29 Aug 2008 15:52:23 -0000
Latest versions of OASIS spec documents owned by the sca-j TC
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 29 Aug 2008 15:23:39 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Notice of resignation and call for nominations
From
Jim Marino <jim.marino@gmail.com> on 29 Aug 2008 15:06:34 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Notice of resignation and call for nominations
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 29 Aug 2008 14:37:31 -0000
Notice of resignation and call for nominations
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 28 Aug 2008 13:45:47 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Should introduction of @Local annotation (JAVA-3) affect theSemantics of an Unannotated Implementation
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 28 Aug 2008 13:02:06 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Should introduction of @Local annotation (JAVA-3) affect theSemantics of an Unannotated Implementation
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 28 Aug 2008 13:01:24 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Should introduction of @Local annotation (JAVA-3) affect theSemantics of an Unannotated Implementation
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 28 Aug 2008 10:14:28 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Should introduction of @Local annotation (JAVA-3) affect theSemantics of an Unannotated Implementation
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 28 Aug 2008 09:40:58 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Should introduction of @Local annotation (JAVA-3) affect theSemantics of an Unannotated Implementation
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 27 Aug 2008 16:51:31 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Should introduction of @Local annotation (JAVA-3) affect theSemantics of an Unannotated Implementation
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 27 Aug 2008 09:42:41 -0000
Should introduction of @Local annotation (JAVA-3) affect the Semantics ofan Unannotated Implementation
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 27 Aug 2008 07:45:52 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Introspecting services offered by a Java implementation classwithout @Service
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 27 Aug 2008 07:27:48 -0000
Introspecting services offered by a Java implementation class without @Service
From
Raymond Feng <rfeng@us.ibm.com> on 25 Aug 2008 16:26:26 -0000
Groups - JEE Specification - WD03 Diagrams (sca-jee-spec-diagrams-WD03.ppt) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 22 Aug 2008 10:55:09 -0000
Groups - JEE Specification - WD03 (sca-jee-1[1].1-spec-wd03.doc) uploaded
From
mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com on 22 Aug 2008 10:54:02 -0000
Re: [sca-j-jee] basic restructure complete
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 20 Aug 2008 09:52:31 -0000
RE: [sca-j] Request to create new Sub-Committee of the SCA-J TC focusing on testing
From
"Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> on 20 Aug 2008 04:40:50 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 59] SCA Spring C & I specification does not statewhat happens when a Bean exposed as a service implements mutliple interfaces
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 18 Aug 2008 18:16:58 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [ISSUE 58] SCA Spring C&I Specification does not havea normative definition of how to calculate the ComponentType of a SpringApplication context
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 18 Aug 2008 18:14:43 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [Issue 57] SCA Spring Client and Implementation Specificationuses an unacceptable namespace
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 18 Aug 2008 18:12:37 -0000
Minutes
From
"Meeraj Kunnumpurath" <mkunnumpurath@googlemail.com> on 18 Aug 2008 17:24:16 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 48: Proposal - update
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 18 Aug 2008 15:03:57 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 48: Proposal
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 18 Aug 2008 14:56:45 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 42: No longer valid due to ISSUE 37
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 18 Aug 2008 14:56:15 -0000
[NEW ISSUE] SCA Spring C & I specification does not state what happens whena Bean exposed as a service implements mutliple interfaces
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 18 Aug 2008 14:51:54 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 48: Proposal - update TWO
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 18 Aug 2008 14:45:35 -0000
[NEW ISSUE] SCA Spring C&I Specification does not have a normativedefinition of how to calculate the ComponentType of a Spring Applicationcontext
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 18 Aug 2008 14:43:00 -0000
[NEW ISSUE] SCA Spring Client and Implementation Specification uses anunacceptable namespace
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 18 Aug 2008 14:38:22 -0000
Inconsistent use of a and an when referring to annotations in the document
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 18 Aug 2008 13:35:56 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 48: Proposal - update
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 18 Aug 2008 12:49:28 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 42: No longer valid due to resolution of ISSUE 44: PROPOSAL
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 18 Aug 2008 11:06:34 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 42: No longer valid due to resolution of ISSUE 44: PROPOSAL
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 18 Aug 2008 10:17:27 -0000
Request to create new Sub-Committee of the SCA-J TC focusing on testing
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 18 Aug 2008 10:12:07 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 18 Aug 2008 09:46:46 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 18 Aug 2008 07:51:39 -0000
ISSUE 42: No longer valid due to ISSUE 37
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 18 Aug 2008 07:30:06 -0000
Re: [sca-j] CD candidate for javacaa spec uploaded
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 18 Aug 2008 05:25:15 -0000
Re: [sca-j] CD candidate for javacaa spec uploaded
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 18 Aug 2008 05:20:47 -0000
ISSUE 48: Proposal
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 18 Aug 2008 04:57:38 -0000
CD candidate for javacaa spec uploaded
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 16 Aug 2008 08:36:15 -0000
Groups - sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-WD04.pdf uploaded
From
Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com on 16 Aug 2008 08:13:57 -0000
Groups - sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-WD04.doc uploaded
From
Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com on 16 Aug 2008 08:13:08 -0000
Groups - sca-jee-1.1-spec-wd01.doc uploaded
From
Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com on 15 Aug 2008 20:24:30 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 14 Aug 2008 15:04:53 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 14 Aug 2008 13:46:30 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2008-08-11.doc uploaded
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 14 Aug 2008 12:56:43 -0000
Re: [sca-j] When more than one interface with the same unqualified nameused in the @Service annotation
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 14 Aug 2008 09:59:31 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 25: Detailed proposal for non-conversational callbacks
From
"Meeraj Kunnumpurath" <mkunnumpurath@googlemail.com> on 13 Aug 2008 22:44:30 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Another early morning brainstorm - conversations revisited
From
Jim Marino <jim.marino@gmail.com> on 13 Aug 2008 17:14:32 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 25: Detailed proposal for non-conversational callbacks
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 13 Aug 2008 15:34:23 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Another early morning brainstorm - conversations revisited
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 13 Aug 2008 15:07:35 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 25: Detailed proposal for non-conversational callbacks
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 13 Aug 2008 14:03:20 -0000
Re: [sca-j] When more than one interface with the same unqualified nameused in the @Service annotation
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 13 Aug 2008 13:55:42 -0000
Re: [sca-j] When more than one interface with the same unqualified nameused in the @Service annotation
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 13 Aug 2008 13:23:39 -0000
When more than one interface with the same unqualified name used in the @Serviceannotation
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 13 Aug 2008 12:00:35 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Discuss: Cancelling the SCA-J Conference calls for upcomingpublic holidays and Christmas
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 13 Aug 2008 07:53:19 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Another early morning brainstorm - conversations revisited
From
Jim Marino <jim.marino@gmail.com> on 12 Aug 2008 18:16:40 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 25: Detailed proposal for non-conversational callbacks
From
"Meeraj Kunnumpurath" <mkunnumpurath@googlemail.com> on 12 Aug 2008 15:38:07 -0000
Discuss: Cancelling the SCA-J Conference calls for upcoming public holidays and Christmas
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 12 Aug 2008 14:31:12 -0000
Raw minutes SCA Java 2008-08-11
From
Jim Marino <jim.marino@gmail.com> on 11 Aug 2008 16:05:52 -0000
test, pl. ignore
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 11 Aug 2008 15:08:38 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 25: Detailed proposal for non-conversational callbacks
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 11 Aug 2008 14:48:34 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Another early morning brainstorm - conversations revisited
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 11 Aug 2008 14:31:33 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 11 Aug 2008 09:09:45 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2008-08-04.doc uploaded
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 11 Aug 2008 08:48:44 -0000
Re: [sca-j] [NEW ISSUE]: Section 7.1 of the Java CAA Specificationis unclear
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 11 Aug 2008 08:17:00 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 25: Detailed proposal for non-conversational callbacks
From
Jim Marino <jim.marino@gmail.com> on 9 Aug 2008 12:09:11 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Another early morning brainstorm - conversations revisited
From
Jim Marino <jim.marino@gmail.com> on 9 Aug 2008 11:52:29 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
nash@uk.ibm.com on 8 Aug 2008 22:26:49 -0000
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 25: Detailed proposal for non-conversational callbacks
From
Jim Marino <jim.marino@gmail.com> on 8 Aug 2008 22:10:12 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Another early morning brainstorm - conversations revisited
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 8 Aug 2008 22:03:02 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Day / time of calls for the JEE subcommittee
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 8 Aug 2008 21:39:35 -0000
RE: [sca-j] RE: New Sub-Committee of the SCA-J TC
From
"Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> on 8 Aug 2008 16:14:53 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Another early morning brainstorm - conversations revisited
From
Jim Marino <jim.marino@gmail.com> on 8 Aug 2008 16:11:13 -0000
RE: New Sub-Committee of the SCA-J TC
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 8 Aug 2008 15:59:45 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Another early morning brainstorm - conversations revisited
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 8 Aug 2008 15:35:20 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Another early morning brainstorm - conversations revisited
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 8 Aug 2008 14:34:01 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2008-08-04.doc uploaded
From
nash@uk.ibm.com on 8 Aug 2008 14:20:00 -0000
RE: New Sub-Committee of the SCA-J TC
From
"Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> on 8 Aug 2008 14:10:49 -0000
RE: New Sub-Committee of the SCA-J TC
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 8 Aug 2008 13:46:12 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Another early morning brainstorm - conversations revisited
From
Jim Marino <jim.marino@gmail.com> on 8 Aug 2008 13:08:13 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Another early morning brainstorm - conversations revisited
From
Bryan Aupperle <aupperle@us.ibm.com> on 8 Aug 2008 13:08:02 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Another early morning brainstorm - conversations revisited
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 8 Aug 2008 12:22:02 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Another early morning brainstorm - conversations revisited
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 8 Aug 2008 12:02:32 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Another early morning brainstorm - conversations revisited
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 8 Aug 2008 10:23:18 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Another early morning brainstorm - conversations revisited
From
Jim Marino <jim.marino@gmail.com> on 7 Aug 2008 22:54:32 -0000
ISSUE 25: Detailed proposal for non-conversational callbacks
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 7 Aug 2008 22:45:13 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Day / time of calls for the JEE subcommittee
From
ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> on 7 Aug 2008 21:28:27 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Another early morning brainstorm - conversations revisited
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 7 Aug 2008 11:41:23 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Another early morning brainstorm - conversations revisited
From
Jim Marino <jim.marino@gmail.com> on 6 Aug 2008 23:18:54 -0000
RE: [sca-j] Day / time of calls for the JEE subcommittee
From
"Savchenko, Vladimir" <vladimir.savchenko@sap.com> on 6 Aug 2008 15:06:12 -0000
RE: [sca-j] Day / time of calls for the JEE subcommittee
From
"Pavlov, Plamen" <plamen.pavlov@sap.com> on 6 Aug 2008 10:00:24 -0000
RE: [sca-j] Day / time of calls for the JEE subcommittee
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 6 Aug 2008 09:14:19 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Day / time of calls for the JEE subcommittee
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 6 Aug 2008 09:02:27 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Day / time of calls for the JEE subcommittee
From
Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> on 6 Aug 2008 06:22:24 -0000
RE: [sca-j] Day / time of calls for the JEE subcommittee
From
"Pavlov, Plamen" <plamen.pavlov@sap.com> on 6 Aug 2008 06:20:28 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Day / time of calls for the JEE subcommittee
From
C Vamsi <vamsic007@in.ibm.com> on 6 Aug 2008 01:18:07 -0000
Day / time of calls for the JEE subcommittee
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 5 Aug 2008 20:53:53 -0000
Re: Fw: New Sub-Committee of the SCA-J TC
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 5 Aug 2008 20:53:53 -0000
Re: [sca-j] Another early morning brainstorm - conversations revisited
From
Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com> on 4 Aug 2008 19:09:21 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 4 Aug 2008 14:25:12 -0000
Groups - SCA Java Minutes 2008-07-24.doc uploaded
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 4 Aug 2008 14:17:12 -0000
[NEW ISSUE] SCA Java Specifications do not Adequately Define theComponentType of a Java implementation
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 4 Aug 2008 12:21:16 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 2 Aug 2008 19:30:51 -0000
Groups - SCA-J Teleconf modified
From
mcombellack@avaya.com on 2 Aug 2008 19:02:17 -0000
RE: [sca-j] RE: Timing of Liaison calls
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 2 Aug 2008 18:47:59 -0000
Re: [sca-j] RE: Timing of Liaison calls
From
Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com> on 1 Aug 2008 15:32:28 -0000
RE: [sca-j] RE: Timing of Liaison calls
From
"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com> on 1 Aug 2008 15:29:08 -0000
RE: Timing of Liaison calls
From
"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com> on 1 Aug 2008 15:20:26 -0000
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.5.0b2