RE: [sca-j] [ISSUE 65] There is no lifecycle defined for SCA Components -Updated proposal revision 4

[Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com>]

Mark,

Comments and suggested changes done
inline in the attached updated document.  Mostly editorial except
for
one significant change in the Running
state, which I'd appreciate everyone to look at:



Yours,  Mike.

Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014    Mobile: +44-7802-467431  
Email:  mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com

From:	"Mark Combellack" <mcombellack@avaya.com>
To:	<sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date:	16/03/2009 22:16
Subject:	RE: [sca-j] [ISSUE 65] There is no lifecycle defined for SCA Components - Updated proposal revision 4

---

Hi,
 
Based on the comments in the
conference call, I have produced version 4 of the specification.
 
To simplify identifying the
changes, I have highlighted them in yellow.
 
Thanks,
 
Mark
Mark Combellack|
Software Developer|
Avaya |
Eastern Business
Park | St.
Mellons | Cardiff
| CF3
5EA | Voice:
+44 (0) 29 2081 7624 |
mcombellack@avaya.com

---

From: Mark Combellack [mailto:mcombellack@avaya.com]
Sent: 15 March 2009 21:28
To: sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [sca-j] [ISSUE 65] There is no lifecycle defined for SCA
Components - Updated proposal revision 3
 
Hi,
 
Following on from Simons comments
in [1], I have updated the proposal by using Simon’s proposed wording
changes. This new version is attached as version 3.
 
Thanks,
 
Mark
 
[1] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-j/200903/msg00061.html
Mark Combellack|
Software Developer|
Avaya |
Eastern Business
Park | St.
Mellons | Cardiff
| CF3
5EA | Voice:
+44 (0) 29 2081 7624 |
mcombellack@avaya.com

---

From: Mark Combellack [mailto:mcombellack@avaya.com]
Sent: 12 March 2009 13:51
To: sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [sca-j] [ISSUE 65] There is no lifecycle defined for SCA Components
- Updated proposal revision 2
 
Hi,
 
As discussed in our conference calls, I have
updated the proposal for JAVA-65 to remove the PostInit and PreDestroy
phases to simplify the model. The attached document contains the revised
proposal
 
All changes for Issue 65 are contained in
a new chapter 4.
 
The changes between this new revision 2 and
the original proposal are:

• Removed the @PostInit annotation and associated state in the lifecycle model
• Removed the @PreDestroy annotation and associated state in the lifecycle model

This update completes my action 2009-02-19-02.
 
Thanks,
 
Mark
Mark Combellack|
Software Developer|
Avaya |
Eastern Business
Park | St.
Mellons | Cardiff
| CF3
5EA | Voice:
+44 (0) 29 2081 7624 |
mcombellack@avaya.com
 [attachment
"sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev2_plus_Issue 65-rev4.doc" deleted
by Mike Edwards/UK/IBM] ---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

---

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev2_plus_Issue 65-rev4_mje.doc