OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

sca-j message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [sca-j] JAVA-139: Proposed resolution


Dave,
I did think about this when writing the proposal.  The coercion
rules for the defaultValue attribute (for properties of any type)
should be the same as the existing coercion rules for a property
value specified in the component definition (for properties of
any type).

Unfortunately, I was unable to find any text in the Java specs
describing the coercion rules for property values specified in
the component definition, or what happens if coercion of these
values fails.  I did not think it was within the scope of JAVA-139
to add new text describing these existing coercion rules for
component property values.

I think the best approach is to raise an issue for the lack of
existing coercion rules for property values.  When this is resolved
by adding suitable text, I can update the proposal for JAVA-139 to
refer to this added text.

To answer your questions: This proposal does apply to properties
of all types, and I do still think we need to do this.

   Simon

David Booz wrote:
> The proposal doesn't say anything about typing. Was your assumption that 
> the runtime would attempt to coerce the string values into the type of 
> the property? If so;
> 1) you need to say how that works in the spec.
> 2) you need to describe what happens if the coercion fails.
> 
> If not, then you need to explicity state that the property type has to 
> be string [] to use this feature.
> 
> Do you still think we need to do this?
> 
> Dave Booz
> STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture
> Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC
> "Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
> Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093
> e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com
> 
> Inactive hide details for Simon Nash ---06/29/2009 06:10:32 AM---I am 
> attaching updated JavaCAA and JavaCI documents containingSimon Nash 
> ---06/29/2009 06:10:32 AM---I am attaching updated JavaCAA and JavaCI 
> documents containing a proposed resolution to JAVA-139.
> 
> 
> From:	
> Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com>
> 
> To:	
> OASIS Java <sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org>
> 
> Date:	
> 06/29/2009 06:10 AM
> 
> Subject:	
> [sca-j] JAVA-139: Proposed resolution
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> I am attaching updated JavaCAA and JavaCI documents containing
> a proposed resolution to JAVA-139.
> 
>   Simon
> 
> [attachment "sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd03+issue139.doc" deleted by David 
> Booz/Poughkeepsie/IBM] [attachment 
> "sca-javaci-1.1-spec-cd01+issue139.doc" deleted by David 
> Booz/Poughkeepsie/IBM] 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 
> 




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]