sca-j message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-j] Q about POJO introspection rules
- From: Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com>
- To: "OASIS Java" <sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 14:27:31 +0000
Anish,
The introspection rules take the simple
view - and it is the simple name that is used when introspecting
a class for the interfaces it implements,
not the fully qualified name.
So in your example of a class implementing
com.foo.DishWasher and com.bar.DishWasher
you'd end up with 2 service names "Dishwasher" which would cause
an error.
To solve this you'd have to annotate
the class concerned with an @Service annotation and spell out the
names that you want used.
If I recall correctly, this was debated
at the time the rules were created and the solution I've outlined was deemed
acceptable for what is a corner case
(note: the interfaces have to have @Remotable applied for any of this to
work, so it seems only a small step
to require the implementation class to have @Service applied).
Yours, Mike
|
|
Dr Mike Edwards
| Mail Point 137, Hursley
Park
|
|
STSM
| Winchester, Hants SO21
2JN
|
SCA & Services
Standards
| United Kingdom
|
Co-Chair OASIS SCA
Assembly TC
|
|
|
IBM Software Group
|
|
|
Phone:
| +44-1962 818014
|
|
|
Mobile:
| +44-7802-467431 (274097)
|
|
|
e-mail:
| mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com
|
|
|
|
|
From:
| Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
|
To:
| OASIS Java <sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
Date:
| 16/03/2011 23:40
|
Subject:
| [sca-j] Q about POJO introspection rules |
I was looking at the POJO spec in the context of resolving
issue 228.
Section 8.1, line 572 of the POJO spec [1] addresses the name of the
introspected service and says the following:
"name attribute is the simple name of the interface or the simple
name
of the class"
Service names have to be unique within a component. In the case where
the class implements multiple remotable interface, how does the 'simple
name' meet this uniqueness restriction?
For example, what happens if my implementation class implements two
remotable interfaces: com.foo.DishWasher and com.bar.DishWasher. You
can't have two services called 'DishWasher' for the same component. Am
I
missing something OR is this a bug and "s/simple name/fully qualified
name/" (for interfaces).
-Anish
--
[1] http://docs.oasis-open.org/opencsa/sca-j/sca-javaci-1.1-spec.pdf
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]