[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-policy] Issue 26 - security policy schema change - updatedproposal
Based on action from 6/23 conf call I am providing feedback on this proposal. Just a couple of minor comments: line 46: needs trailing "/" in: " <allow roles="listOfNCNames"/> " line 93: same as line 46, needs trailing "/" lines 101-102 says "... MUST satisfy the following security management requirements." and then the section ends. This is confusing. It appeared to me that the reqts were left out, but see next comments: line 102: I suggest it should be terminated with a ":" and then apply the next suggestion for lines 104-127. lines 104-127: I suggest making this a list of 4 bullets rather than 4 section numbers. Additional comment I noticed in the main FW document, wd5, line 391: provides="authentication.message exactlyOne" should probably read: provides="authentication.message exactlyOnce" Also, question on the above: wouldn't it make sense to have "exactlyOnce" and the other reliability intents be qualifiers to to a parent "reliability" intent? (If so, I could submit new issue, if not, then this is just a typo fix) Thanks, Rich Mike Edwards wrote: OFA3F387F9.37620055-ON8025746D.007190F7-8025746D.0072733B@uk.ibm.com" type="cite"> |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]