[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: ISSUE-110 Suggested wording
Dave's suggested wording is: All intents in the required intent set for an element SHOULD be provided by the directly provided intents set and the set of policySets that apply to the element./ /[POL40018 <#POL40018>] If the combination of implementationType / bindingType / collection of policySets does not satisfy all of the intents which apply to the element, the configuration is not valid. The conformance statement is a SHOULD while the paragraph following it reads like a MUST. Anish argued last week that intents must be satisfied so it may be better to change the conformance statement to a MUST. Also, I suggest that the end of the second paragraph be extended to read "is not valid and an error MUST be raised". -- All the best, Ashok
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]