I think that this is good.
Regards,
Debra
From: Julia
McCarthy [mailto:julia@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006
4:00 PM
To: Robert Dickau
Cc: sdd@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [sdd] 2.2.11
I like
the suggestion to change allows to enables. That makes option 2 read this way:
Option 2) 2.2.11 The SDD specification must support
definition of information which enables a provisioning application or
installation program to construct relevant feedback for progress, dependency
check failures and change execution failures.
Julia McCarthy
Autonomic Computing Enablement
julia@us.ibm.com
Tie/Line 349/8156
877-261-0391
"Robert
Dickau" <rdickau@macrovision.com>
"Robert
Dickau" <rdickau@macrovision.com>
03/02/2006 01:58 PM
|
To
|
<sdd@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
|
RE: [sdd] 2.2.11
|
|
Agree with Option 2
(avoids awkward "support the ability to define" construction),
possibly with "allows" changed to "enables".
From: Julia McCarthy [mailto:julia@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Thursday, 02 March 2006 11:10 am
To: Patton, John H
Cc: sdd@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [sdd] 2.2.11
The
original:
2.2.11 The SDD specification must support the ability for the author to define
the information in order to specify description information for components and
requirements, to allow a provisioning application or installation program to
construct a relevant message in the event of dependency check failures,
progress messages and change execution failures. This is intended to assist a
user in understanding errors and other messages, which may occur during the
deployment lifecycle process
John's rewrite:
Option 1) 2.2.11 The SDD specification must support the ability for the author
to define the information to allow a provisioning application or installation
program to construct relevant feedback for progress, dependency check failures,
and change execution failures.
My wordsmithing that maintains John's meaning:
Option 2) 2.2.11 The SDD specification must support definition of information
which allows a provisioning application or installation program to construct
relevant feedback for progress, dependency check failures and change execution
failures.
Please vote for an option or suggest an alternative along with the rationale
for your suggestion.
Julia McCarthy
Autonomic Computing Enablement
julia@us.ibm.com
Tie/Line 349/8156
877-261-0391