RE: Submission to RSA Conference?

[Jahan Moreh <jmoreh@sigaba.com>]

I am perfectly willing to withdraw my proposal in favor of a joint proposal.

Also, I think there is a lesson to be learned here in terms of our posture
vis-a-vis conference proposals. Perhaps we should designate an informal
process whereby anyone who wishes to submit a SAML related talk to
well-known conferences would pass it by the group first.

Jahan

---------------------------
Jahan Moreh
Chief Security Architect
Sigaba Corp.
jmoreh@sigaba.com
tel:  310.476.3767
cell: 310.890.9391
fax: 310.476.7189



>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jeremy Epstein [mailto:jepstein@webmethods.com]
>Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 1:04 PM
>To: Jahan Moreh; Krishna Sankar; ROUAULT,JASON (HP-FtCollins,ex1);
>Mishra, Prateek; oasis sstc
>Subject: RE: Submission to RSA Conference?
>
>
>Not trying to tell anyone what to do, but.... do you think
>you'd stand a
>better chance of getting SAML accepted on the agenda if there
>were one or
>more *joint* proposals, instead of a bunch of individual ones?
> Will the
>conference team say "we can't pick which one, so let's reject
>them all"?
>Based on last year, my gut feeling is that they're not going
>to accept a
>whole bunch of SAML presentations... so a consortium approach
>might be a
>reasonable compromise.
>
>Just a thought...
>--Jeremy