RE: Question re: core-12 Authenication Code

["Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>]

The bigger issue is whether <Protocol> and <AuthenticationMethod> are the
same element (Say yes).

	Phill

Phillip Hallam-Baker FBCS C.Eng.
Principal Scientist
VeriSign Inc.
pbaker@verisign.com
781 245 6996 x227


> -----Original Message-----
> From: George Robert Blakley III [mailto:blakley@us.tivoli.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 4:36 PM
> To: Hal Lockhart
> Cc: 'Hallam-Baker, Phillip'; 'security-services@lists.oasis-open.org'
> Subject: RE: Question re: core-12 Authenication Code
> 
> 
> I agree "authn method" is better.  In fact, I remember 
> complaining about
> authn type even as I was writing it down.
> 
> 
> --bob
> 
> Bob Blakley (email: blakley@us.tivoli.com   phone: +1 512 436 1564)
> Chief Scientist, Security and Privacy, Tivoli Systems, Inc.
> 
> 
> Hal Lockhart <hal.lockhart@entegrity.com> on 08/20/2001 02:36:39 PM
> 
> To:   "'Hallam-Baker, Phillip'" <pbaker@verisign.com>,
>       "'security-services@lists.oasis-open.org'"
>       <security-services@lists.oasis-open.org>
> cc:
> Subject:  RE: Question re: core-12 Authenication Code
> 
> 
> 
> Actually, I checked and the whiteboard transcription says 
> "AuthN type". I
> consider AuthN Method to be preferable.
> 
> Hal
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip [mailto:pbaker@verisign.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 6:48 PM
> > To: 'Hal Lockhart'; 'security-services@lists.oasis-open.org'
> > Subject: RE: Question re: core-12 Authenication Code
> >
> >
> > I think it came off the whiteboard.
> >
> > I would very much like to rename it, AuthenticationMethod
> > sounds good to me.
> > I think we should also rename the protocol element in
> > <Authenticator> to be
> > the same.
> >
> > [We can also change authenticator but that is another story 
> and first
> > someone needs to come up with a better name, HolderOfKey 
> being worse]
> >
> > Phillip Hallam-Baker FBCS C.Eng.
> > Principal Scientist
> > VeriSign Inc.
> > pbaker@verisign.com
> > 781 245 6996 x227
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Hal Lockhart [mailto:hal.lockhart@entegrity.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 5:29 PM
> > > To: 'security-services@lists.oasis-open.org'
> > > Subject: Question re: core-12 Authenication Code
> > >
> > >
> > > I was wondering why the term "Authentication Code" was
> > chosen for the
> > > consensus schema. I thought we had been using "Authentication
> > > Method" a term
> > > that seems more intuitive to me.
> > >
> > > Hal
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> > > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
>

Phillip Hallam-Baker (E-mail).vcf