[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [security-services] Minutes for Telecon, Tuesday 05 Mar 2002
Minutes for SSTC Telecon, Tuesday 05 Mar 2002 Dial in info: +1 334 262 0740 #856956 Minutes taken by Steve Anderson > > 1) Roll Call > - Attendance attached to bottom of these minutes - Quorum achieved. > > 2) Dealing with end of Last Call (COB 3/7), can all issues be voted > on by 3/12 > - Joe: Aggressive schedule, can enough people commit for those days? - Or do we fall back to 3/19? - Hal: depends on kinds of comments received. impression is that issues raised by committee members have champions, but those from outside (e.g. SAP) don't necessarily - Joe: would like to dissect posting from SAP during focus group session today - Joe: not hearing pushback or commitment on this aggressive schedule - Prateek: can commit - Chris: can promise time over weekend - Hal: assuming we don't get 10 more SAP-like emails, can commit - so far, most postings besides that from SAP don't have significant impact - Joe: candidate golden master set of specs would be available 3/18 - Joe: do we need interim specs before then? - Jeff: is there a list of outstanding issues that have been agreed to and is it written down? - Scott: would seem appropriate for issues list - Hal: there are changes that fall below the threshold of an issue - Joe: need to sweep the mail and issues list, and champions need to re-post changes that have not yet been made - Joe: volunteer to do this sweep? - Hal: seems to fall to me by default - Scott: has been up to individual champions - Joe: was going to be recommendation anyway - Joe: for each individual, please put all outstanding *agreed-to* changes into a single message, by COB Thursday 3/7 - Joe: doc editors are to act on these first > > 3) Discussion on implementations > - Joe: need 3 attestations to go to OASIS, and committee chairs have 2, leaving us short - Joe: nudging implementation sources that can accelerate getting to core-27 to consider what it might mean to your organizations - Eve: suggests making the nudging more broad, not just to the committee members - Jahan: do we need 3rd instance of web browser profile? - Joe: yes, but if you don't cover that, but do cover other aspects, speak up, as other implementations may/not overlap - Joe: note we must be able to publicly release these attestations > > 4) Characterization of comments being received > - Joe: largely covered in first issue > > 5) (Irving's) ISSUE: Actions & Action elements Issue > > < http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/security-services/ > 200202/msg00186.html > > > follow up from Simon > < http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/security-services/ > 200202/msg00188.html > > - Irving: don't see the value in the original intent to be big enough to offset the confusion - Irving: moves to take the format of his message, taking the friendly amendment from Simon - [VOTE] no objections - Joe: another item for Phill - Irving: will send out modified schema > > 6) Other business > - Prateek: move to vote on Name identifier proposal < http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/security-services/ 200203/msg00023.html > - Prateek: answering Simon's response, it is a typo < http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/security-services/ 200203/msg00025.html > - Prateek: takes Simon's comment as friendly amendment - RLBob: final sentence should be up in original description of name qualifier - Prateek: accepted as additional friendly amendment - [VOTE] no objections - Prateek: will generate fresh text incorporating amendments, and send to Phill and list - RLBob: additional question about what was just voted on, the WinNT term involves an obsolete product name - Prateek: sought any better term, but found none - Rob: might find it in SSPI spec from Microsoft - Scott: NTLM might be closer - Hal: how about MS Windows? - Rob: or Windows domain - Prateek: accepted as friendly amendment - Irving: MS might not approve use of trademarked name, which would also apply (more or less) to previous WinNT term - Joe: directs Prateek to contact MS about form of reference that would be acceptable - RLBob: has another resource for researching this - Prateek: will use Windows domain for now, pending response from MS - Joe: any objections to proceeding as discussed? [none] > > 7) Adjourn > - Adjourned - continuing call as focus group ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Attendance of Voting Members: Allen Rogers Authentica Irving Reid Baltimore Simon Godik Crosslogix Hal Lockhart Entegrity Carlisle Adams Entrust Robert Griffin Entrust Don Flinn Hitachi Joe Pato HP Chris McLaren Netegrity Prateek Mishra Netegrity Steve Anderson OpenNetwork Rob Philpott RSA Security Jahan Moreh Sigaba Jeff Hodges Sun Eve Maler Sun Aravindan Ranganathan Sun Emily Xu Sun Bob Morgan UWashington Phillip Hallam-Baker Verisign Attendance of Observers or Prospective Members: Scott Cantor OSU Tim Moses Entrust Membership Status Changes: Nikolaj Nyholm Ascio Technologies - Requested observer status Bhavna Bhatnagar Sun - Granted voting status after call -- Steve
begin:vcard n:Anderson;Steve tel;fax:727-561-0303 tel;work:727-561-9500 x241 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:www.opennetwork.com org:OpenNetwork Technologies version:2.1 email;internet:sanderson@opennetwork.com title:Product Architect adr;quoted-printable:;;13577 Feather Sound Drive=0D=0ASuite 390;Clearwater;Florida;33762;USA x-mozilla-cpt:;-6352 fn:Steve Anderson end:vcard
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC