Re: [soa-eerp] I052: Use of Business Rating Not Clear

["eerp_sy@changfeng.org.cn" <eerp_sy@changfeng.org.cn>]

The document named EERP Model and UseCase WhitePaper PDF 
(EERP-Model-UseCase-WhitePaper.pdf) has been submitted at 
www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/33289/EERP-Model-UseCase-WhitePap
a
er.pdf 

The use of BusinessRating, messages exchange flow, and use cases are
documented. 

This issue can be closed. 

Original Message:
-----------------
From: William Cox wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:34:17 -0400
To: eerp_sy@changfeng.org.cn, wtcox@coxsoftwarearchitects.com,
soa-eerp@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [soa-eerp] I052: Use of Business Rating Not Clear


The example document is not in our work area at this time.

The explanation is needed for a successful public review, looking forward.

This information could be put in an informative (non-normative) appendix 
to the spec. 

bill cox
--
*William Cox*
Email: wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com 
<mailto:wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com>
Web: http://www.CoxSoftwareArchitects.com
+1 862 485 3696 mobile
+1 908 277 3460 fax


eerp_sy@changfeng.org.cn wrote:
> It is proposed to change the protocol of this issue to: 
>
> Protocol: examples
>
> Artifact: example 
>
> Type: design 
>
> That is the issue to be addressed in the Example document. No spec chnages
> are required on this issue. 
>
>
>
> Szu Chang 
>
> Original Message:
> -----------------
> From: eerp_sy@changfeng.org.cn eerp_sy@changfeng.org.cn
> Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 16:25:57 -0400
> To: wtcox@coxsoftwarearchitects.com, soa-eerp@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [soa-eerp] I052: Use of Business Rating Not Clear
>
>
> Issu # I052
>
> Realted issue: I048
>
> Original Message:
> -----------------
> From: William Cox wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com
> Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 23:05:58 -0400
> To: soa-eerp@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [soa-eerp] NEW Issue: Use of Business Rating Not Clear
>
>
> PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL OR START A DISCUSSION THREAD UNTIL THE 
> ISSUE IS ASSIGNED A NUMBER.
>
> The issues coordinators will notify the list when that has occurred.
>
> Protocol: rating
>
> Artifact: spec
>
> Type: design
>
> Title: Use of Business Rating Not Clear
>
> Description:
>
> BusinessRating-v1.0-spec-wd05.pdf
>
> The use of BusinessRating is not clear from the specifications. The use 
> case document (proposed in the Related Issue) would help a great deal. 
> The bidirectional nature, communicating both a claimed set of 
> credentials+ratings and (apparently) a validated set of 
> credentials+ratings is confusing in that it uses the same instance to 
> communicate two different things.
>
> The two way usage is also confusing in that it follows the "peek/poke" 
> model of setting parts of a data structure and returning it; if this is 
> indeed what's being done in the intended use, it should be changed to 
> something more appropriate for the SOA/web services environment.
>
> Related issues:
> Use Case Document and additional justification
>
> Proposed Resolution:
>
> Refactor to avoid the confusing two way use. Add rationale in a 
> non-normative appendix to explain and justify the choice made.
>
>
> bill cox
> --
> *William Cox*
> Email: wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com 
> <mailto:wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com>
> Web: http://www.CoxSoftwareArchitects.com
> +1 862 485 3696 mobile
> +1 908 277 3460 fax
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://link.mail2web.com/mail2web