[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [soa-rm-ra] Resend with readable jpg: My takeway (whilelistening in to another telecom)
Thanks James, I'm fine with this. The multiplicities don't cause me a problem. Cheers, REx At 9:24 AM -0400 6/25/09, James Odell wrote: >More on "directional" association classes, attached. > >-Jim > >On 6/24/09 5:37 PM, "Rex Brooks" indited: > >> Hi again Folks, >> >> >> Sorry you couldn't read the diagram I attached the first time. I >> didn't realise that until got back into my home office a few minutes >> ago. So none of what I said below could make much sense. The first >> time I saved in EA it did something screwy. I doubt my penchant for >> eliminating whitespace in filenames had anything to do with, but I >> left the diagram name alone this time and it worked. >> >> So now you can see what I came away with from today'smeeting. >> >> Cheers, >> Rex >> >> >> >> Hi Folks, >> >> I shouldn't say I'm not going to do something when my next task is to >> listen into another meeting (and a looooong one) where I don't have >> to participate much. So I have attached my takeaway from today's >> meeting for the Trust and Risk in Willingness diagram. If EA allows a >> bi-directional Association Class, I couldn't find out how to do it, >> however, in practice both Trust and Risk should go in both >> directions, or you can just think of the actors as swapping >> positions. However, in any case, I think we should make their >> definitions as close to identical as we can as opposite Association >> Classes. >> >> Now: >> >> Trust: Trust is an actor's private perception of the commitment >> another actor has to a goal together with an identifiable set of real >> world effects associated with that goal. >> >> Risk: Risk an an actor's private perception that another actor's >> actions will impede fulfillment of the first actor's objectives. >> >> At a minimum I think Risk should say that "Risk is an actor's private >> perception that another actor's action and other factors will impede >> fulfillment of the first actor's objectives. >> >> What I suggest: Trust is an actor's private perception that another >> actor's actions and other factors will aid fulfillment of the first >> actor's objectives. >> >> I added other factors because different external and internal factors >> may apply between Trust and Risk and are part of the assessment of >> how well another actor's action will effect attaining the Desired >> Real World Effect. >> >> I chose the Risk definition to make them identical just because it >> was shorter and more terse and commitment is, IMO just another >> factor, a big one, but just one of many. >> >> So, In light of both Ken's prior effort and Danny's I think we are at >> least getting honded down. >> >> Cheers, >> Rex >> > >Attachment converted: Macintosh HD:Actor & Trust.pptx (PPTX/PPT3) (0178989F) >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that >generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: >https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php -- Rex Brooks President, CEO Starbourne Communications Design GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison Berkeley, CA 94702 Tel: 510-898-0670
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]