-----Original Message-----
From: Rex Brooks <rexb@starbourne.com>
To: soa-rm-ra@lists.oasis-open.org RA <soa-rm-ra@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Fri, Apr 30, 2010 2:13 am
Subject: [soa-rm-ra] Section 3.1 Rewrite
Hi Everyone,
This is my first shot at rewriting Section 3.1. I have one main
consideration that I wasn't sure about. Does Section 3.1 refer only to
Subsections in 3.1, or does it also refer to Sections 3.2, 3.3, etc? I
dealt only with issues in Section 3.1-3.1.4.1.
I deleted the example in the 3.1 because I thought it muddied rather
than clarified issues when what is needed is to set the stage for the
discussion of Actors, Action, Joint Action and Communication as Joint
Action. It tended to get the reader engaged with explanatory details
immediately and for me that was a distracting rather than clarifying.
However, in rereading the whole section, I felt strongly that the
explanation of Service Action as a specific kind of Action and the
Counts-As logical equivalence needs an example that we all agree shows
these critical elements clearly.
Cheers,
Rex
--
Rex Brooks
President, CEO
Starbourne Communications Design
GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison
Berkeley, CA 94702
Tel: 510-898-0670