FW: review needed of new section 3.1

Jeff,

Thanks for the feedback. You provide a good combination of having history but also being removed from the recent discussions. That gives you perspective while also a bit of distance to ensure we haven’t headed down a blind alley.

Also thanks for your offer of updating the models. You see we have just used sketches while sorting out ideas, so there will definitely be a need for new models and updates. We’ll let you know when we’re stable enough to make use of your offer.

Ken

From: Estefan, Jeff A (3180) [mailto:jeffrey.a.estefan@jpl.nasa.gov]
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2012 6:18 PM
To: Ken Laskey; peter@peterfbrown.com
Subject: FW: review needed of new section 3.1

Ken and Peter. Forgot and replied to the raf list, which of course bounced. So below is a copy of my response. Cheers! - Jeff

From: Estefan, Jeff A (3180)
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2012 3:12 PM
To: soa-rm-ra@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc: Thornton, Danny R (IS); ellis@deccs.com
Subject: RE: review needed of new section 3.1

Good additions Ken and Peter. Let me know when you reach a steady-state on the various changes and I’ll create a new set of diagrams if you need me to. Cheers! Also, in the footer and the filename, you are still using “soa-ra-xxx”. Is the plan to stick with that or move to to “soa-raf-xxx”? - J

soa-rm-ra message