[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [soa-rm] Modified Issues List
The use of the term action seems ambiguous. You have Pending Review: Agreed action taken by editor & waiting review by TC Pending: Waiting for agreed action to be taken which imply that the action referred to is the suggestion of the TC reviewer. There is another action, the results of the TC discussion / vote which might result in a different resolution. If the TC vote is just a confirmation / rejection of the proposal, then the extra status is redundant. Somehow, I doubt that will always, or frequently be the case, especially for the early reviews. Michael At 10:54 AM 5/19/2005, Don Flinn wrote: >Michael > >I'm missing your point. Doesn't pending, pending review and closed cover >these cases? Pending review is intended to mean that the responsible >party (editor or a TC member) is in the process of doing the agreed upon >action. Review means the action has been completed and is waiting review >by the TC. I'd like to keep the status values to a minimum, but if we >need another one, no problem. > >Don > >On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 09:06 -0400, Michael Stiefel wrote: > > How about one more status value? > > > > Pending Action: TC has agreed on action, awaiting completion. > > > > Depending on the volume of suggestions, and the ability of the editors to > > make revisions, it might be worthwhile for the TC to see what issues it > has > > actually disposed of (Closed, and Pending Action), and those that have > > actually been put into the draft document (Closed). > > > > Michael > > > > At 08:36 AM 5/19/2005, Don Flinn wrote: > > >As per the discussion at the 5/18/05 telecom, I have added the a Status > > >and a Proposed Disposition column to the issues list. The headings now > > >read (No line breaks in the Excel sheet) > > > > > >ID Status Draft Title Submitter Type Section > > >Lines Original Text Suggested text Notes > > >Proposed Disposition Disposition Disposed in > > > > > >I'm not sure we need Section and Lines since these should be in the > > >description, if applicable. I'll leave them there for now. > > > > > >The status column will have the following values. > > > > > >Status > > >- Closed: Action on issue taken and accepted > > >- Open: No action taken on issue > > >- Pending Review: Agreed action taken by editor & > > > waiting review by TC > > >- Pending: Waiting for agreed action to be taken > > >- Withdrawn: Issue withdrawn by issuer > > >- Duplicate: Issue same as another issue (Example Dup of 07-1) > > > > > > > > >Don > > > > > >-- > > >Don Flinn > > >President, Flint Security LLC > > >Tel: 781-856-7230 > > >Fax: 781-631-7693 > > >e-mail: flinn@alum.mit.edu > > >http://flintsecurity.com > > > > > > >-- >Don Flinn >President, Flint Security LLC >Tel: 781-856-7230 >Fax: 781-631-7693 >e-mail: flinn@alum.mit.edu >http://flintsecurity.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]