Re: [soa-rm] [issue:structure] draft 07, sect 2, line 201, Figure 2-1

[Michael Stiefel <development@reliablesoftware.com>]

I agree that a processing model is important.

Nonetheless, how does a processing model fit into a single service. Does 
not a processing model imply more than one service?

At one point people were distinguishing a POA from a SOA.

Michael

At 06:18 PM 5/20/2005, Francis McCabe wrote:
>Duane:
>1.  Process model as in WSDL/BPEL/CDL etc. The order of actions
>against a service is at least as important as the data exchanged.
>2. Yes, contracts are dependent on policies
>Frank
>P.S. Good work. However painful it may seem, the process is proving
>lightning fast. Perhaps there is more agreement on SOAs than on Web
>Services:)
>
>On May 20, 2005, at 3:05 PM, Duane Nickull wrote:
>
>>Frank:
>>
>>Thank you.
>>
>>Francis McCabe wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I would prefer to see
>>>1. policy, contract linked together -- reflecting the
>>>contract=agreed  policy idea.
>>
>>DN - would it be fair to state that a contract is dependent upon a
>>policy?  I think this is in alignment with the thinking from the F2F.
>>
>>
>>>2. data model is one of the constraint types, like policy and
>>>contract.
>>
>>DN - that makes sense.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>3. we should also mention process model if we are going to call
>>>out  the data model.
>>
>>DN - pertaining to the process of the service, not multiple
>>services I presume?  For example - the way WSDL can describe the I/ O 
>>charateristics of a specific service??
>>
>>I may whip up CoreRM7.png shortly.
>>
>>Duane
>