[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [tag] Is it best for us to include the PrescriptionLevel values in the schema?
>Another option is to either include the values as documentation Yes - we don't have to restrict code values in the Schema - we could just recommend to use the three defined in the Guidelines. -jacques -----Original Message----- From: stephengreenubl@gmail.com [mailto:stephengreenubl@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Green Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 12:14 PM To: TAG TC Subject: [tag] Is it best for us to include the PrescriptionLevel values in the schema? I think we need to think over whether we really want to include code values for the prescriptionLevel in the Test Assertion Markup Language schema. If we do this it may make it technically difficult for anyone to add further values or use different values. Maybe that has some merit but it may even make any future versions of TAML by TAG TC incompatible with this version if that version included new values. Another option is to either include the values as documentation or to provide a codelist some other way such as OASIS Genericode and/or specifying in the prose of the spec. --- Stephen D Green PS: Should the TAML spec have test assertions?? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]