[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [xtm-wg] Re: Charter: Participating Member conditions
(Most of my thoughts on this... topic... Why is there no XTM email?... are in a response to Patrick.) [steve writes] > "one economic interest, one vote" Works for me. [hans writes] > > Do we have to attend the next two meetings to be considered > > for Participating Membership or could we ask for Participating > > Membership immediately? [steve writes] [various options snipped] Actually, what I think STEP is asking for is Founding Member status. Wouldn't that solve the problem of recognizing STEP's contributions even though they weren't at the last two meetings? [steve writes] > I must tell you that, in my own personal view, it is unbecoming for > STEP to take the position that it should be exempted from > responsibility to participate in meetings, just as the founders > already have, before becoming a Participating Member. Steve, BE TEMPERATE!!!!! -- much as I agree with the logic. It wasn't clear to me either how to become a founding member. [steve writes] > Because progress requires continuous involvement by specific persons. Works for me. S. ===== <? "To imagine a language is to imagine a form of life." -- Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations ?> __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC