[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [trans-ws] XHTML version of Trans WS
On Sat, 16 Jul 2005, Andrzej Zydron wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > Please find attached the XHTML version of the spec document. I have > applied the OASIS style sheet to the document, but I think that the > XLIFF one works much better as regards code fragments etc. Hi Andrzej. Nice to see that you have used XHTML, per the encouragement from Mary McRae: "I'm thrilled to hear that Trans WS wants to use XHTML to produce their specifications!" [1] > > To meet the full OASIS spec requirements as suggested by Robin Cover > will entail quite a bit more work over and above what we already have. Clarification: my posting [2] does not (intend to) add any new requirements to the official ones, which can be clarified by Mary McRae or by David Petraitis. [3] My message says three things: 1) Please take time to participate in the OASIS member review of the draft "Artifact Identification Requirements" (AIR) document which was prepared by the OASIS TAB and is open for comment through July 27, 2005. [4] Note that these requirements for artifact identification are not "official" in any way: the document is just a draft proposal for Member review. 2) I support your decision to use XHTML in your spec work, even though the OASIS TC Process document [5] at the present time does not appear to allow the TC to present XHTML as an approved format: only "HTML" is approved. As we know, there are major differences between HTML and XHTML: HTML, if it's valid, conforms to an SGML DTD; XHTML is XML, and uses namespaces (etc). The AIR document at lines 315-316 is consistent with the current "OASIS Technical Committee Process" [5], which says in section 2.18 'Specification Quality' that "All TC-approved versions of documents (i.e. Committee Drafts, Public Review Drafts, and Committee Specifications) must be submitted to the TC's document repository in the editable source, HTML, and PDF formats." 3) If you want to see the OASIS Technical Committee Process amended to allow the use of XHTML as an approved format, you could indicate this request in connection with your review of the AIR proposal. Alternately, of course, if you want to request a change in the OASIS Technical Committee process, you could (a) mention this to your TC Staff contact; (b) send a note to Mary McRae, who works with the templates [mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org]; (c) have your Technical Committee send a TC-sponsored memo to the OASIS Board of Directors, who approved the Technical Committee Process [6]; (d) post a message to the oasis-member-discuss list at oasis-member-discuss@lists.oasis-open.org; do all of (a) - (d) Since I wrote my earlier message, I changed my mind about this: > For these reasons and others, I believe the AIR document > and the TC Process document should mandate XHTML for OASIS > TC (final) spec work. It should probably be "should allow XHTML for OASIS TC (final) spec work" (not "mandate"); someone informed me that some TCs prefer to use tools that can produce HTML but not XHTML > > Best Regards, > > AZ Thanks! Robin Cover [not speaking officially for OASIS] ======= Refs: [1] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/trans-ws/200507/msg00005.html [2] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/trans-ws/200507/msg00007.html [3] David Petraitis <david.petraitis@oasis-open.org> **Note: David may be the OASIS Staff Contact for your TC, but I am not sure; as of today, the member roster does not indicate who the TC's Staff Contact is http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/membership.php?wg_abbrev=trans-ws http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/trans-ws/members/roster.php [4] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tc-announce/200507/msg00001.html http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/members/200507/msg00001.html "Member review of draft Artifact ID Requirements, by 27 July" Archive: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/oasis-member-discuss/ [5] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php [6] The OASIS Technical Committee Process is a document approved by the OASIS Board of Directors; see: http://www.oasis-open.org/private/bod_minutes_03_23_05.pdf the Board approves the proposed updates to the TC Process See also: http://www.oasis-open.org/private/bod_minutes_09_18_03.pdf Unfortunately, neither the TC Process document nor the OASIS Policies and Procedures document provides a clue to indicate what a TC Member should do if s/he wished to request a change in the TC Process: http://www.oasis-open.org/who/policies_procedures.php http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php One possible option would be to send email to the OASIS Board of Directors: http://www.oasis-open.org/who/bod.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]