AW: UBL_ Amount. Type

["David Kruppke" <dill2@gefeg.com>]

Steve,

I know the political reasons but if CCTS restricts the Amount Currency to
the UN/ECE codelist then the the CoreComponentType schema is not quite
correct.

Best Regards David

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: stephen_green@seventhproject.co.uk
> [mailto:stephen_green@seventhproject.co.uk]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 31. März 2004 13:10
> An: David Kruppke
> Cc: Tim McGrath; Stephen Green; ubl-clsc@lists.oasis-open.org; Michael
> Dill
> Betreff: Re: UBL_ Amount. Type
>
>
>
> David
>
> I think that your idea is technically sound but that we should be
> extremely wary, for political rather than technical reasons, of any
> changes to the CCT Schema module.
>
> All the best
>
> Steve
>
>
> David Kruppke <dill2@gefeg.com> wrote on 31.03.2004, 10:06:45:
> > Hi Tim and Stephen,
> >
> > I 've been thinking about this "UBL_ Amount.Type" thing and I'm
> wondering if
> > there is an easier solution.
> >
> > Why don't we change the CoreComponentType schema like this:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > /xsd:simpleContent>
> > /xsd:complexType>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >      ...
> >
> >
> >
> > This is full CCTS compliant. If you have a look at the
> description  for the
> > CCTC "Amount Currency. Code List Version. Identifier" it says
> "The Version
> > of the UN/ECE Rec.9 code list.". That means CCTS already restricts the
> > currency Identifier to a code from the UN/ECE codelist. All
> other doesn't
> > make sense. There are no 2 or more list of currency code list on earth.
> >
> >
> > Best regards David