RE: [ubl-dev] XML Name and Address Structure [NAD]

["Crawford, Mark" <mark.crawford@sap.com>]

Steven,

Suggest you talk to Margaret Pemberton.

Mark 
Mark Crawford 
SAP Standards Architect 
Office: 703 670-0920 
Mobile: 703 485-5232
---------------------------------------------------------- 
Chair UN/CEFACT Applied Technologies Group 
Lead, UN/CEFACT XML NDR Standard
Lead, UN/CEFACT Core Components Harmonization Project
Co-Chair, ISO TC154 Core Components 


 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen GOULD [mailto:stephen.gould@halisa.net] 
> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 1:15 PM
> To: ubl-dev@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [ubl-dev] XML Name and Address Structure [NAD] 
> 
> Hi - has anyone have any comments on the UN/CEFACT Name
> and Address Structure that I could pass on to these groups ?
> 
> This group of IT Experts have been reviewing whether the two XML
> address formats in the Australian eCommerce Standard AS 4590
> can be simplified to one format only.
> 
> it appears that UN/EDIFACT also has two EDI Structures in the
> Address Format.
> 
> Can this also be simplified to a single Address format ?
> 
> Regards
> 
> Stephen GOULD
> 
> 11:22 Wed 13 Dec 2006						
> REF:ZXSARCF1
> 								
> 			Y/R: AS 4590
> TO:	IT Expert eReview Committee	cc	UN/CEFACT
> 	Name & Address Structure			
> Standards Australia
> 	AUS ECOMMERCE STANDARDS	Interested Parties
> 
> Hi - Thank you for taking the time to review the current AS 4590
> Structure and submitting your responses.
> 
> ALL the responses received confirm that the simplex version for the
> Name and Address format of AS 4590 can be replaced by the 
> Complex Version !
> 
> Not only that Joost confirmed that a structured format is required
> for effective data mining - two responses placed on home page
> http://www.oic.org
> 
> REVIEW UN/CEFACT - POSSIBLE UN/CEFACT SUPPORT
> 
> In addition we have reviewed the UN/CEFACT eTrade documents
> stipulated in the Port of Melbourne EOI 13110 and provided
> a comparison for your consideration
> http://www.oic.org/z/XZIG/UNCEFACT/ 
> 
> As the Mission Statement of UN/CEFACT sates that it "supports 
> activities dedicated to improving ebusiness activities" this review by
> you may be  of considerable importance to UN/CEFACT hence
> the copy to Duane NICKULL.
> 
> UN/CEFACT may want to support this initiative as:
> 
> 1	Standards Australia has not been able to reconvene IS/11, 
> 
> 2	Tradegate has shut down ebXML Australia and 
> 
> 3	The Federal Government "retired" the  Australian Panel 
> of eCommerce
> 	Experts 
> 	http://www.ecommerce.treasury.gov.au/html/expert.htm 
> 
> NEXT STEPS
> 
> B	FRI 15 DEC - BY 17:00 
> 
> 1	review new format again as draft AS 4590 address segment
> 
> 2	If still agree Complex version can replace simplex version
> 
> Please send e-mail
> 
> 3	"I have reviewed proposed AS 4590 single XML Address
> 	and still consider it as the best option as an eCommerce
> 	Standard"
> 
> Thank you
> 
> Regards
> 
> Stephen GOULD
> Chair 
> XLM & eCommerce Special Interest Group
> OPEN INTERCHANGE CONSORTIUM
> 
> E:	sggould@oic.org
> M:	0416-009-468
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ubl-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: ubl-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
> 
>