RE: [ubl-lcsc] [code lists] drafct of section to put in document ation - for comment

["G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>]

At 2003-10-27 14:29 +0100, Stig Korsgaard wrote:
>And that statement Mark, I strongly agree with!

Perhaps Stig you could clarify for me if you agree with the use of foreign 
code list expressions or foreign code list values.  In a reply moments ago 
I've distinguished my concerns and my understanding of the impacts of 
choosing one or the other.

I've never tried to impede supporting foreign code list values and thought 
the methodology proposed was the best way (from a deployment and 
maintenance perspective) to integrate said values from absolutely any 
source in any regularly structured XML expression (including W3C Schema 
expressions) into UBL-compliant expressions.

Thanks for helping me to better understand this.

.............. Ken

--
Next public European delivery:  3-day XSLT/2-day XSL-FO 2004-01-??
Instructor-led on-site corporate, government & user group training
for XSLT and XSL-FO world-wide:  please contact us for the details

G. Ken Holman                 mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com
Crane Softwrights Ltd.          http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/
Box 266, Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0    +1(613)489-0999 (F:-0995)
ISBN 0-13-065196-6                       Definitive XSLT and XPath
ISBN 0-13-140374-5                               Definitive XSL-FO
ISBN 1-894049-08-X   Practical Transformation Using XSLT and XPath
ISBN 1-894049-11-X               Practical Formatting Using XSL-FO
Member of the XML Guild of Practitioners:     http://XMLGuild.info
Male Breast Cancer Awareness  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/bc