Re: [ubl-lcsc] [code] updated Catalogue and some draft schemas

[Anne Hendry <anne.hendry@sun.com>]

Hi,

One other decision from in Friday's call, but which shouldn't
impact your processing:

    -  all the code values we currently have would be placed in
       .xsd files so that there will be no values in the CLC itself ,
       the column "Actual Values" would only contain empty cells or
       cells with an "=" sign.


- Anne

Stephen Green wrote:

>Chee-Kai
>
>Hi
>
>The last meeting included a discussion about our 
>previous meeting's decisions
>
>1) to add the names and descriptions to the codes in 
>codelists  
>
>2) to include the descriptions in the catalogue 
>spreadsheet
>
>3) to somehow include the description from 2) in the 
>codelist schemas.
>
>Tim and Jon particularly discussed this and decided 
>that we need to realign with our Montreal conclusion 
>about the scope of the codelist team and LCSC 
>codelist work, so
>
>1) the latter would just need to concentrate on 
>producing enumerated lists of codes themselves 
>
>2) the schemas should just include these codes 
>themselves at present (a Codelist SC will be proposed 
>by Jon at the San Francisco TC plenary to deal with the wider issues)
>
>3) the information gathered and produced on the 
>descriptions of codes should be preserved for later 
>in the spreadsheet
>
>The result is that for now the tool shouldn't include 
>any treatment of the descriptions of the codes, just 
>of the codes themselves (the enumerated lists). This is to avoid committing UBL to a particular solution 
>to the issues we've been raising beyond what was 
>decided already in Montreal.
>
>I hope this doesn't require inconvenient adjustments 
>yet again for you Chee-Kai at this stage. It does 
>allow us though to concentrate our efforts for now to 
>the smaller agreed area of codelist implementation, 
>leaving the wider issues to a further phase after the 
>beta release.
>
>Another output from the last LCSC call will be a 
>draft 13 model with a few minor but important changes 
>(three changes resulting from the codelst work). I'll update and send you the model this weekend sometime for your conversion to schemas. The firm 
>intention is that this draft will be the one proposed 
>as the beta on Tuesday next week.
>
>There should be some fine tuning of the codes in use 
>by UBL at the San Francisco meeting.
>
>The three changes to the model are
>
>1) to replace the OrderCancellation.CancellationReasonCode (was 
>mandatory) with a non-code (Text) BBIE since we could 
>not find a codelist and yet it is a mandatory BIE
>
>2) for similar reasons as in 1), to remove the OrderResponseSimple.RejectionReasonCode leaving just 
>the RejectionReasonNote
>
>3) to rename the three Contact BBIEs concerned with 
>contact channels to match the names or codes given 
>for these in the UNCL channel codelist (for 
>consistency and to leave less room for confusion)
>
>I hope this all makes sense.
>
>All the best
>
>Steve
>
>
>  
>