[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [ubl-ndrsc] Proposal 3 in our CCTS feedback
I took an action to suggest revised wording for Proposal 3 in our CTTS feedback. How's this? "We suggest that the definition of Representation Term be modified to encompass the function of both Representation Terms and Core Component Types, and that the notion of Core Component Types be removed, e.g. ..." I think we will also need to come up with an actual list of what the RTs would be (though perhaps this belongs in a separate Proposal 3a, or perhaps it should be associated with Proposal 4). Please see my recent message for my proposed list. We don't have to tackle the "inheritance" aspect at this time -- we can avoid it just by providing a flat list -- but if people familiar with the CCTS process think it will be well received, we can try it. Thanks, Eve -- Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190 Sun Microsystems XML Technology Center eve.maler @ sun.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC