[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [ubl-ndrsc] Minutes for 29 May 2002 UBL NDR SC meeting
Minutes for 29 May 2002 UBL NDR SC meeting 1. Roll call (quorum is 8) * Bill Burcham regrets * Mavis Cournane YES * Mark Crawford regrets * Fabrice Desré YES * Matt Gertner YES (left x:57) * Arofan Gregory awol * Jessica Glace YES * Eduardo Gutentag YES * John Larmouth awol * Eve Maler YES * Sue Probert awol * Lisa Seaburg YES * Gunther Stuhec awol * Paul Thorpe awol Quorum not reached by x:15. We proceeded informally. 2. Acceptance of minutes of previous meeting 22 May 2002 http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl-ndrsc/200205/msg00018.html Deferred. 3. Adoption of agenda Adopted with the topic of F2F agenda matters moved up. 11. F2F agenda Here is the current plan of record. Some CM SC topics we thought could be usefully covered, even though Matt and Bill won't be present, are: use case buildup and specialization architecture paper review. Eduardo is willing to chair the CM sessions. Mon 9-2: UBL plenary, lunchtime feature, etc. 2-4: joint NDR/CM planning session Tue 9-12: CM (e.g., use case work and reviewing the spec arch paper) 1-3: NDR 3-5: joint NDR/LC session: syntax-dependent features Wed 9-12: CM 1-5: NDR (w/ 1.5 hours of X12 joint session) Thu 9-12: CM 1-5: NDR Fri 8-10: joint NDR/CM wrap-up session 4. Status review Mavis: - A: (With Bill) Incorporate CCTS feedback metamodel into the Relationship with CC section of NDR doc. MAY NOT GET INTO DRAFT THIS TIME Eve: - A: Code list paper. DONE - A: Work with Mike Rawlins on figuring out a schedule. DONE - A: Prepare a report of the NDR SC's activities for the F2F. Bill: - A: Update modnamver. - C: Role model paper. Arofan: - A: Write up concern about importing indirectly so that Bill can research the issue. - B: Forward the latest version of the xCBL versioning paper. - B: Containership paper. Gunther: - B: Facet paper. IN PROGRESS? - C: Date/time paper. Fabrice: - A: Make proposal on local vs. global elements. Summary of work: A Code lists DONE A Modnamver IN PROGRESS A Review the purchase order schema design WAIT FOR NEXT DRAFT A Local vs. global elements -- round 2 IN PROGRESS A Officially decide elements vs. attributes DONE A Officially decide empty elements DONE A External recommendations for changes to CCTS DONE A Global attributes DONE B Core component types in XSD IN PROGRESS B Tag structure IN PROGRESS B Containership B Fixed vs. varying types C Dates and times 5. Barcelona update No one on the call were in Barcelona last week! 6. Code lists We agreed that it's too circular and inconvenient to require external code list modules to use our simple types for supplementary components, so we agreed that instead they must use the attribute names that we dictate in order for us to know that they intended the CCTS semantics. We didn't agree yet on whether to recommend XSD documentation elements in external code list modules. We will leave this point open in the NDR document. 7. Modnamver URLs vs. URNs in namespace names vs. schema locations: deferred. 8. Local vs. global elements We reviewed Fabrice's new proposal. He compares the current solution with a solution that uses local qualified (not unqualified) elements. We will continue to work on this at the F2F. 9. Facets Deferred. 10. Approve NDR document and position papers Does the NDR document contain the following information? Code lists, CCTS metamodel, modnamver, possibility of reconsidering local vs. global. Yes, all these are sufficiently covered. Are these position papers ready? Modnamver, code lists, elements vs. attributes, maybe facets?, maybe local vs. global? We couldn't vote, but we informally agreed that the NDR document is ready for its second review distribution. 12. Adjourn Adjourned at y:55. -- Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190 Sun Microsystems XML Technology Center eve.maler @ sun.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC