Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Rule: 96 Two Schema

[Chin Chee-Kai <cheekai@softml.net>]

Objection : Stating two versions of schemas that are 
            otherwise the same except for documentation
            is a user-level optimisation/preference issue
            that shouldn't become a hard-rule from UBL/NDR.

This is not to say that we cannot publish as a non-normative
add-on, or reading aid or optimized version (assuming 
documented version is normative).

Suggest removing it.


Best Regards,
Chin Chee-Kai
SoftML
Tel: +65-6820-2979
Fax: +65-6743-7875
Email: cheekai@SoftML.Net
http://SoftML.Net/


On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Lisa-Aeon wrote:

>>Rules for Voting:  Each email will have only one rule in it, I will try to
>>mark the rules that group with it, or rules that might duplicate it.  The
>>membership has 5 working days to bring forth objection or discussion, after
>>the 5 working days, if there are no objections, the rule will be assumed to
>>be "ACCEPTED" and be given to the LCSC for their implementation.
>>
>>Please Reply leaving first email in Reply.
>>
>>Voting period on this rule ends:  July 22, 2003
>>
>>*******************************
>>[R 96]  Two schemas shall be developed for each standard.  One schema shall
>>be a run-time schema devoid of documentation. One schema shall be a fully
>>annotated schema that employs XHTML for the annotations.
>>
>>
>>ATG Decision:  ACCEPTED.
>>
>>
>>---
>>Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
>>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>>Version: 6.0.498 / Virus Database: 297 - Release Date: 7/8/2003
>>