[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Rule: 96 Two Schema
Removing it allows one to do or not do this. I believe the general request is to provide these two forms of the schema and there should be a rule/requirement that states this. ..dan At 10:51 PM 7/15/2003 +0800, Chin Chee-Kai wrote: >Objection : Stating two versions of schemas that are > otherwise the same except for documentation > is a user-level optimisation/preference issue > that shouldn't become a hard-rule from UBL/NDR. > >This is not to say that we cannot publish as a non-normative >add-on, or reading aid or optimized version (assuming >documented version is normative). > >Suggest removing it. > > >Best Regards, >Chin Chee-Kai >SoftML >Tel: +65-6820-2979 >Fax: +65-6743-7875 >Email: cheekai@SoftML.Net >http://SoftML.Net/ > > >On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Lisa-Aeon wrote: > > >>Rules for Voting: Each email will have only one rule in it, I will try to > >>mark the rules that group with it, or rules that might duplicate it. The > >>membership has 5 working days to bring forth objection or discussion, after > >>the 5 working days, if there are no objections, the rule will be assumed to > >>be "ACCEPTED" and be given to the LCSC for their implementation. > >> > >>Please Reply leaving first email in Reply. > >> > >>Voting period on this rule ends: July 22, 2003 > >> > >>******************************* > >>[R 96] Two schemas shall be developed for each standard. One schema shall > >>be a run-time schema devoid of documentation. One schema shall be a fully > >>annotated schema that employs XHTML for the annotations. > >> > >> > >>ATG Decision: ACCEPTED. > >> > >> > >>--- > >>Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > >>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > >>Version: 6.0.498 / Virus Database: 297 - Release Date: 7/8/2003 > >> >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]