Re: [ubl-ndrsc] Rule: 96 Two Schema

[Chin Chee-Kai <cheekai@softml.net>]

On Sat, 19 Jul 2003, Anthony B. Coates wrote:

>>** Reply to message from Chin Chee-Kai <cheekai@softml.net> on Wed, 16 Jul 2003
>>10:08:16 +0800 (SGT)
>>
>>...
>>Although I understand the orthodoxy behind only wanting a single normative
>>version of any deliverable, I strongly support UBL providing the two flavours
>>of Schema.

So I suppose we don't differ so much here.  Is it right
to say that your point being:  Provide the undocumented
version to help others, but ok with having only one 
normative form (say, the documented one)?

I'm certainly not against (not that I have any influence
in the final decision) supplying multiple forms
within what TC members can provide.  We're doing that
already anyway with supplying spreadsheets-equivalent,
UML-equivalent diagrams, etc.




Best Regards,
Chin Chee-Kai
SoftML
Tel: +65-6820-2979
Fax: +65-6743-7875
Email: cheekai@SoftML.Net
http://SoftML.Net/