Re: [ubl-security] Question about the Dsig Profile as a separate deliverable

["Roberto Cisternino" <roberto@javest.com>]

... I hope the HTML or PDF of the whole UBL 2.1 specification will not
hang my browser... or the PDF reader.

Can we virtually have a unique specification and phisically splitted
sections ?

Let's think baout the usability as I often had troubles while playing such
long documents.

It is not clearly an issue generated by the dimension of our
specifications... but tools are not well designed all the time :-)

Take care

Roberto

> It appears that we're all agreed to incorporate the Dsig profile into
> the main UBL 2.1 deliverable.  Ken Holman has kindly agreed to take the
> first pass at this reorganization.  Many thanks to the Security SC for
> its work in making this possible!
>
> Jon
>
> Roberto Cisternino wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> I agree too.
>>
>>> I agree. Our work was meant also as a best practice for implementing an
>>> UBL extension and this can be better emphasized within UBL 2.1 spec.
>>>
>>> Andrea
>>>
>>> Il giorno 19/nov/2011, alle ore 11:20, Oriol Bausà Peris ha scritto:
>>>
>>>> Hi Jon,
>>>>
>>>> I think that incorporating it into the UBL 2.1 spec itself would be
>>>> the
>>>> best option
>>>>
>>>> Best regards
>>>> Oriol Bausà
>>>>
>>>> El 18/11/2011, a las 18:17, Jon Bosak escribió:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello UBL Security Subcommittee,
>>>>>
>>>>> As we begin to finish UBL 2.1, an editorial question has arisen with
>>>>> regard to the Digital Signature Profile that you produced last year.
>>>>>
>>>>> In the first two public review cycles, the Profile, formatted as an
>>>>> independent specification, has been included in the review package
>>>>> (in
>>>>> the doc subdirectory).  But from an editorial point of view, it would
>>>>> be
>>>>> better either to publish the Profile as a separate deliverable (i.e.,
>>>>> make it a Committee Specification) or to incorporate the material
>>>>> into
>>>>> the UBL 2.1 specification itself.  Incorporating it into the main UBL
>>>>> 2.1 document would make relevant information easier to find.
>>>>>
>>>>> Before we come to a decision on this, we need to know whether members
>>>>> of
>>>>> the Security Subcommittee have an opinion regarding the need to
>>>>> publish
>>>>> the Profile as a separate document.  If there is such a need, then of
>>>>> course that will decide the issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please consider this question and let us know what you think.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Jon Bosak
>>>>> Chair, OASIS UBL TC
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ubl-security-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: ubl-security-help@lists.oasis-open.org
>
>


-- 
* JAVEST by Roberto Cisternino
*
* Document Engineering Services Ltd. - Alliance Member
* UBL Italian Localization SubCommittee (ITLSC), co-Chair
* UBL Online Community editorial board member (ubl.xml.org)
* Italian UBL Advisor

  Roberto Cisternino

  mobile: +39 328 2148123
  skype:  roberto.cisternino.ubl-itlsc

[UBL Technical Committee]
    http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ubl

[UBL Online Community]
    http://ubl.xml.org

[UBL International Conferences]
    http://www.ublconference.org

[UBL Italian Localization Subcommittee]
    http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ubl-itlsc

[Iniziativa divulgativa UBL Italia]
    http://www.ubl-italia.org