Re: [ubl] A necessary update to the model spreadsheets

["Stephen Green" <stephen_green@seventhproject.co.uk>]

Folks

 

It's never finished until it's finished. Thanks to Chee-Kai

for pointing out that OO had capitalized the 'e' in 'ero'. I

missed that. Sorry. Here is a further correction.

 

I'd better point out here that the regeneration of Schemas is

not necessary for these spreadsheets since the changes

actually make the spreadsheets more consistent with the

latest Schemas (apart from the known issue of DENs for

ASBIEs which still have differences in interpretation of the

CCTS regarding truncation to two components when the third

is a duplicate of the second - an issue defered to UBL 1.1).

 

All the best

 

Stephen Green

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Stephen Green

To: ubl@lists.oasis-open.org

Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 11:25 PM

Subject: [ubl] A necessary update to the model spreadsheets

Folks

 

Many thanks to Saito-san for spotting a glaring error in the invoice

spreadsheets - and profuse apologies for having caused the error

somehow in Copenhagen. This error is in the spreadsheets sent

in message http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200408/msg00076.html

Here the invoice spreadsheets did not include the previously made

amendments after the original 'cd' version.

 

The attached spreadsheets correct this. They also correct a mismatch

with the Schemas concerning the OperatorCode codelist Schema

in that we have now changed the namespace prefix from 'opr' to 'ero'.

The latter change is in the UBL-SpecializedDatatypes-1.0 spreadsheets.

 

Please check these anyone if you may and please would these now

be substituted for the existing copies in the cd2 package.

 

All the best

 

Stephen Green

 

 

 

---

To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl/members/leave_workgroup.php.

mod.zzz