[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl] Discussion of substitution groups
Folks,
As we are looking at substitution groups
in
advance of the codelist discussion
(though
leading into it of course) I thought I'll
need
to jump the gun a bit
on prototyping I
adapted
from some work I've been doing
with Marty
(based on his prototypes for codelist
extension).
It uses the latest UBL 2.0 draft
schemas
sent by David over the last few days.
It demonstrates both
1. Marty's codelist mechanism which now
uses substitution groups * without abstracts *
(personally I'm all
for that following the work
we did with Arofan,
though I still dislike the
abstract element/type method)
2. Arofan's general minor versioning
(and customisation) mechanism which we
worked on in the working team in
April.
Notably, using the latest schemas is
rather more satisfying and assuring in
that it shows there to be no
development
problem at all in using the
substitution
group / global elements / global types
(without abstracts) / derivation
mechanism
with our current 2.0 schemas to
produce
a * hypothetical * 2.1 set of extended
minor
version schemas (both BIEs and
codelists
extended).
The attached file can be saved with
extension
.zip then unzipped.
All the best
Steve
----- Original Message -----
|
SDG_SubstitutionGroups_20050718.zzz
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]