[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] virtio: pci support virtqueue selective enabling
On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 9:09âPM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 07:55:11PM +0200, Eugenio PÃrez wrote: > > Reusing virtqueue reset method to enabling a vq. > > > > Signed-off-by: Eugenio PÃrez <eperezma@redhat.com> > > --- > > transport-pci.tex | 4 ++++ > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/transport-pci.tex b/transport-pci.tex > > index a5c6719..04c0429 100644 > > --- a/transport-pci.tex > > +++ b/transport-pci.tex > > @@ -375,6 +375,10 @@ \subsubsection{Common configuration structure layout}\label{sec:Virtio Transport > > > > \item[\field{queue_enable}] > > The driver uses this to selectively prevent the device from executing requests from this virtqueue. > > + If the driver negotiates VIRTIO_F_RING_ENABLE_ANYTIME or > > + VIRTIO_F_RING_RESET, the driver writes 1 to this field to enable a > > + virtqueue. See \ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Virtqueues / Selective Virtqueue Enable} > > + and \ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Virtqueues / Virtqueue Reset}. > > 1 - enabled; 0 - disabled. > > No, this is always used to enable queues even with no features. > Yes. Now I see it is confusing if reading the spec and not the diff, but my intention was to not modify the behavior without the feature flags. Maybe there is a better way to achieve it. > > \item[\field{queue_notify_off}] > > -- > > 2.31.1 >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]