Re: [virtio-comment] Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] transport-pci: Introduce legacy registers access using AQ

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 12:54:53PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
> 
> 
> > From: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2023 3:15 AM
> 
> 
> > It's not conformant to that statement then :( It's a SHOULD which means if you
> > know exactly what you are doing, there could be exceptions.
> > In this case it's a SHOULD because it was added after 1.0 and we did not find a
> > way to negotiate this requirement since it's the feature negotiation itself.
> 
> True. May be in future such device can update the revision id.

You can already change it but that doesn't imply anything at all,
in 1.0 revisions are vendor specific.

-- 
MST