RE: [PATCH v7 3/4] admin: Add group member legacy register access commands

[Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>]

> From: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2023 5:57 PM

> > I have mixed feelings; I think definition in transport and link in generic section
> is fine.
> > Are you ok with that?
> 
> I am yet to focus on wording, can't tell you for sure.  My gut feeling is that
> keeping everything in one place would be more readable, will help us converge
> more quickly, and the next user of admin commands is expected to be SIOV
> which would need the same structure anyway (it's also PCI).
>
Ok. For v8 I will have link and keep in pci transport section. Later I can move as union if needed.
SIOV for PCI and CXL will look very different, so SIOV legacy I am not expecting any change for these commands.
 
> Also look at virtio_pci_notify_cap and check whether any normative statements
> there should apply here. Alignment I guess?

I will move below normative from pci to generic.

The group member driver SHOULD use the notification region supplied by the group owner driver.